Any scheme based on odometer readings could cause some conflict for Space Karen.

If you are driving a thing with wheels, presumably you want roads on which to do it.

And unless you and rather a lot of your friends are volunteering to work on road crews out of love of the smell of hot asphalt, those need to be paid for.

Personally, I like targeted consumption taxes like this. You don't drive? Then you don't pay for roads you don't use. (You still pay the pass through on physical goods that need transported, but that's also as it should be.)

A lot of times that sort of thing was corruption, not stupidity. (Although I'm sure there were plenty of suckers, too.)

A pension fund would buy some old man's stamp collection as an "investment". Just so happened the old man was a relative of the fund manager.

Sounds almost quaint compared to Kushner selling the country to Mr. Bone Saw.

Fluorescent lights burn bright over a windowless basement cubefarm. It is 1:24 AM, and Bill Alberts, 48, is living his best life.

Due to an org chart mishap, he has been given exclusive control over a neglected application shipped in the base install of Windows, and he is having going nuts, adding every feature he ever dreamed of.

He knows his time is short; soon enough some auditor will notice. He reviews his (HIS!) feature roadmap with a combination of anxiety and glee.

though of course you need a volcano to make it work.

Which explains Khosla's interest. If this ends up not working out as a retail power play, it can pivot to the supervillain volcanic lair market.

Although Zuckerberg has already probably had to solve power for Koolau Ranch.

Utterly hilarious. You may have sounded out the words of my post, but you clearly did not understand them.

No, not that one.

The one I mean is when the argument switches from "climate change is a hoax, stupid hippy" to "Nothing we can do, climate change. Sucks to be you."

there can be content negotiation

What happened to a sense of professionalism? Hell, of wanting people to not laugh at your work? They expect people to pay money for this junk?

I have to imagine the C-suite at a lot of places feels intense pressure to have "an AI roadmap".

Fine. That doesn't mean you ship not even half-baked bullshit.

This isn't about jerking off to robot porn, it is about performance monitoring - the only thing that functionally matters is the accuracy.

It amazes me that so much simply non-functional junk is passed off as wizzbang magic technology.

I swear that's Microsoft's unofficial motto.

The Copy-Paste mechanism has been a well-defined, widely-understood basic action for personal computers since at least 1984, arguably before.

The defining characteristics are either duplicating or moving one or more digital objects to a new position in a document.

Notice those verbs. Nothing about rewriting/translating/making different. The closest the mechanism gets to that is, for inter-application transfer, there can be content negotiation to deal with format issues.

Just waiting for the first time this "fixes" something in a mortgage or a sentencing memo...

Yeah, there's already one made-for-tabloid-news lawsuit magnet out there.

That explains why you got so wound up over a cheap joke that you ranted at me about things I never said.

Thanks for explaining yourself.

That sig quote is a line from a song.

"which today is an end user tools business, will become, essentially an infrastructure business in support of agents doing work."

It sure sounds like he's saying he doesn't want the desktop anymore. I think everyone should help them with that and drop Windows today.

Argentina's Randian ubermench also got $40 billion of our money.

But if it makes you feel any better, a lot of that just flowed back to administration members and their friends.