That would put a dent in SpaceX's clients list.
Actually, Apple does try to catch those apps that sign out. In the process, they will miss the more cunning ones. And they make false positives.
One of my free iOS Apps, a RPN stack-based scripting language, came with some sample scripts you could in-click install (aka, move from App bundle into the sandboxed Documents). The App also had a button linking directly to a Wiki explaining the language and had copies of the scripts.
Somehow Apple evaluated that my App downloaded the sample scripts from my wiki down to the user device. They considered it violated the TAC concerning the "download of executable code" and had refused my original App submission. No amount of debating on the phone with Christ Whats-His-Name resulted in him even wanting to listen, giving me the cold shoulder. I shrugged it off, reworked some of the app and shipped.
Many revisions later, the App actually still has some sample scripts that it "auto installs". Just no longer has the Wiki link directly (it has a script to access it and now, inline manual).
I get 1 new recruiter request per month. What typically follows is spamming of job offers because one keyword matched in their database. Such as "programming". I've had some pretty interesting offers once in a while. Perhaps not interesting enough to jump ship after all the advantages I have for working 18 years in the same house, but some came very close. But on the average of 10-15 offers a month, most are totally irrelevant to what my profile lays out in terms of specialties and experience.
The problem boils down to the recruiters not understanding the core technologies they're being tasked as manning. So they shoot all around hoping for a positive hit because they want their fees and will go as far as sharing their fees with a sign-in bonus.
Can you imagine a 500$ sign-in bonus would have an 18 year veteran jump ship?
If you can't be bothered creating an account or resetting your lost password, you can forget about any meaningful offer.
probably means their 80s sound track is not purveying the proper image of modernness and cutting edge they require.
Thank you. Precisely what pushed me away from G+ and ultimately YouTube. They forced me to change my user ID and logon to a G+ account which I did not care for, less so for gmail. In the end, not only did I never cared for G+, it made me abandon my YouTube account because I can't be bothered remembering the stupid GMail/G+ account they force me to use.
Too bad because YouTube is still the best video sharing outlet.
Frankly, I'm probably going to move my videos to FB once they do release their video sharing platform.
Dr. Flamand: Do you mean what this could mean to California residents?
Nick: Wow! They'd have enough salt to last forever!!
Could be me. Took multiple readings to understand the structure of that phrase. Capitalisation might be to blame.
And who is going to apologize for that title grammar?
0.38g really makes this a lot simpler than on Terra.
Mars would be the ONE place that is safe for a space elevators.
No nut job wanting to asplode the base or sever the cable mid-length.
It would make landing cargo and people trivial, including return trip.
See how the switch work. It could not have been unintentional:
...as an astromech droid serving drinks aboard a sail barge.
I'm pretty sure the plume of molten copper of an RPG couldn't give a crap about a shockwave.