Comment Re: DirectX is obsolete (Score 1) 135
No they don't.
PS 3 - Hardly anyone used PSGL, rather LibCGM
PS 4 - http://develop.scee.net/files/presentations/gceurope2013/ParisGC2013Final.pdf
Wii U uses GX
No they don't.
PS 3 - Hardly anyone used PSGL, rather LibCGM
PS 4 - http://develop.scee.net/files/presentations/gceurope2013/ParisGC2013Final.pdf
Wii U uses GX
They already have to do it for every games console anyway.
Forget this urban myth that games consoles support OpenGL.
DirectX is obsolete. In today's multiplatform world only OpenGL matters.
Funny, last time I checked OpenGL wasn't supported in any games console.
Even the half baked version available on the PS3 was barely used.
Same here. Even had an email signature with a statement from Stallman.
Nowadays GNU/Linux is confined to VMs and a travel netbook.
My work and main private laptop run Windows 7. I just bought Windows 8.1 and do consulting work on Java,
Easy it would be called BeOS, Symbian, Genode, Windows 9 maybe (if the kernel transition to compile with C++ is already done)
Access to the OS for C application development outside a VM, EFL/enlightenment as the native application toolkit and access to a QT port.
Maybe you should read the developer documentation. Qt and EFL got replaced by the Bada C++ native framework.
Fully agree with you. Even in 1975 there were better, safer languages than C for systems programming.
There are also compilers that spit out native binaries for Java and
Really?!
The last time I checked there are quite a few of window managers available.
That is what I call stone age programming.
Programming like the 70's, Yuupppiiii!
I'm sorry, this logic just doesn't work when operating systems are bundled with hardware.
Why not? It was like that before the PC took over the consumer market.
There were other kings before and there will be other kings afterwards. No kingdom lasts forever.
The king is dead, long live the king.
Fear?! I pity you, poor guy that cannot pay for a C compiler...
Wow! Is there a law that says all operating system vendors are obliged to provide a C compiler, even if developed in another system programming language?!
Great, maybe they can attempt to implement C99 now 12 years later. I am still required to cripple my C code so it will be accepted by Microsoft's crappy compiler, years after everyone else has moved on. Respecting standards in one place doesn't mean they actually respect standards.
They sell a C++ compiler why should they care about C? C is officially legacy for Microsoft.
http://herbsutter.com/2012/05/03/reader-qa-what-about-vc-and-c99/
There is no law that forces C++ compilers to support plain C. It made sense when the language did not had a big user base.
Plus there are plenty of C compiler vendors for Windows that would happily sell you a compiler.
What ever you want is going to cost a little more than it is worth. -- The Second Law Of Thermodynamics