Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Apple is anticompetitive at its core. (Score 2) 490

by MemoryDragon (#39019931) Attached to: Apple Launches New Legal Attack On Samsung

Except that all of the mentioned patents are bull**** it is even worse that Android had voice search 1-2 years before Apple. Same goes for slide to unlock, a dutch court just threw apple out of the court after Samsung showed prior art regarding slide to unlock. What apple here simply does is landgrabbing and then suing people left and right and sometimes even people who have contracts with the original landowners.

Comment: Re:In this case, Size Does Matter (Score 1) 233

by MemoryDragon (#38863589) Attached to: Siri Competitor Evi Arrives, But Already Overloaded

Well there are some things in WinMo of the old and also in old Nokia Phones which no smartphone yet has matched.
The Nokia phones had excellent cameras with Carl Zeiss objective lenses and could make an alarm from the alarm clock even if the phone was turned off (sort of super standby)

In case of Winmo, Android comes closest with its configurability, but WinMos downfall simply was its bugs. I once had a phone with version 6.1 or so, and that one had the shoddiest browser I have ever seen in my life (about five years into ie6) and could not even trigger an alarm correctly, by suddenly buzzing off at midnight although the alarm was set to 7. Add to that the ghastly usability and you have a stinker despite being very flexible under the hood.
Over the years there were lots of excellent mobile osses (I once had a Zaurus), but in the late 90s Microsoft killed all of them with their market dominance. I am not to unhappy that Microsoft does not get too much foothold currently into the mobile space. They still have the shoddiest browser standardswise.

Comment: Re:Btrfs (Score 1) 271

by MemoryDragon (#38593724) Attached to: Linux 3.2 Has Been Released

Yes that can be a real problem for people with lots of files. Years ago I did programming on Windows (thank god anymore) there were literally thousands of files in my home dir.
The problem was there was this threshold of number of files which if you crossed it brought the FS to a crawl. I could notice that by deleting a few files then suddenly performance was back (except for the defragmentation induced one) once you crossed this boundary performance were back to a crawl.
Add to that the windows inherent pessimistic locking and worse fragmentation than on most unix filesystems and you are in for hell.

Now I am on a mac, no matter how crappy HFS+ is in many aspects from a users point of view it scales way better than NTFS with lots of files.

Wow! Look!! A stray meatball!! Let's interview it!

Working...