DNS registrar? I don't follow. Do you have a registrar for your DNS provider or are you talking about your Domain Name registrar?
In either case the entity that has control of a domain can issue certificates for the Domain. Meaning your domain registrar can issue certificates with every cert provider if they are evil. Doesn't make a difference what/who the registrar is, you or central.
Exactly. On Linux you can automatize system administration very well with FOSS. Yes, you have to use different tools, but, for example, SSH-ing into a box with certificate-based authentication when it is up is trivial. Scripting that way is trivial. Even a doing a full installation (on top of a minimal one) this way is trivial. Doing updates this way is trivial. All with the security mind-set that UNIX was designed with from the start.
We were successfully managing 1,500 Windows and Mac desktops with exactlyone Windows Admin and exactly one Mac Admin, along with a DBA/Report generator person to help admin staff get the reports/data they needed.
We had absolutely zero interest in SSHing into individual desktops to run scripts - managing the desktops with Group Policy was a simple, well-known mechanism. I don't mean this as a disparaging judgement, but your comments are really about today, 15 years after the fact - I'm talking about the state of the systems in 2010, not 2025, and your comments make me think you've never seen how a well-run windows shop is administered.
You missed his whole point. You don't need third party software to administer an unlimited number of Linux boxes, you can script it with built in tools that can connect and manage the box. For Windows admins who want to manage Linux there is also GUI tools.
I'm not even going to mention that you can migrate the OS and all the installed software onto newer hardware remotely and have it run for 30 years by multiple migrations and regular software upgrades.
Windows is PITA to manage but I guess it's what you are used to.
You are right in your statement but you don't manage 1,500 Linux/Unix stations like Windows that's why it was so expensive. There are tools for free to even manage a greater number of stations.
When you lock yourself in a proprietary system and tools then you are right that they don't work on other systems. It's not Linux that is restricting your use.
My kids grew up using systems no employer used. They grew up computer literate and today they have no issues using any computer even the ones employers use.
the Facewatch system has a 99.98% accuracy rate,
So one in every five thousand people who walk into your stores is going to be falsely accused of a crime? Wow, thanks for making abundantly clear that people should NOT shop there...
Flag as Inappropriate
My math may be wrong but that would be 2 out of every thousand nt five thousand.
In the last 40 years, not once has the OS given me a reason to suspect they didn't have my best interest in mind. Never have they inserted advertising or pushed unwanted features. Never have they changed my configuration. I have no concern that they will invade my privacy since I choose what is running and what is submitted. They do not harvest my private information and I do not need an account to have access to the code which is available in full.
I do not need to look at every diff of every update because not once have they ever done anything to warrant such behaviour. Every time I checked, which is regularly, it never differs. And YES, I do recompile everything myself before pushing it out. You make it sound as if it's a difficult task.
No. Nothing is automatically applied.
The reason MS can get away with this is because people have locked themselves in a proprietary system which they refuse to migrate from.
Change your attitude. Demand open standards. You will be surprised how stable computing can become.
You make it sound as if MS and the open source community work in the same way. In the last 40 years I have never experienced a open source OS like Linux or FreeBSD install software that I didn't request. If they had, all the tools to suppress/remove it are available.
Precisely no one in the world audits all code going into their computer via updates
It guess then this would surprise you that many audit the code or packages that they install. I will guarantee you that the packages installed on my servers are all approved by me. But that's me and I would say diligent sysadmins.
These days smoking is rare.
Really? Where do you live?
What's new? The next new tariff will be on every nation that breaths because they are consuming Trump's air.
How do you make America ugly? You elect Trump.
I come to realize that humans stumble forward by trial and error. The thing is, it takes multiple errors and we learn for a while then we repeat the same errors from the past.
We learnt nothing from smoking, drinking and porn. We have to once again repeat the error with social networks.
The answer is clear but you get blasted for mentioning it. So I won't.
Fix the small things that just don't seem to work.
One example is when I want to switch from Bluetooth to speaker that it just accept my choice and not switch back. It's a quirk that happens here and there. The same thing happens with Android auto when the button changes color showing me that I pressed it but doesn't accept the input. I have to hold it down for a second more.
Call recording is legal here but not available. I'm told my supplier doesn't permit it and yet it's a phone I purchased. The implied additional contract is just insulting.
Volume seems to choose when to work. I don't touch the volume so it's not that I lowered it.
It feels like we are so quick to bring out features that nothing is tested or verified. Just reboot to fix the problem.
Are you implying that the artist makes money on the resale of that art?
was created so artists would release their work to the public and be compensated. So why do we offer copyrights on stuff that is not made available or removed from the market.
How about we change the law into something that removes copyright when it's not available, or no longer available.
We need to change the laws that allow lock in, or that change the terms after purchase.
"What protects Europe is the ability to govern, audit, and mitigate risk, not where a company files its corporate papers," said Thomas Boue of BSA.
That would be true if the company could ignore the law of the country where it files it's papers. Then again you govern by enacting laws that impose conditions that companies have to follow therefore it's not for BSA to tell Europe how to govern.
Look at Microsoft history and then tell me about alternatives. If Microsoft sold MSOffice from the start there would be no MSOffice today. If the US is so great why are so many US companies based in Ireland?
Nationalism is basic social welfare for billionaires. Look at MAGA how it's destroying the constitution for the sake of Merica and its billionaires. Hurrah!
Europe is approaching this as some flex on the US because the US with it's orange clown decided that that's what needs to happen. It's not just Europe.
Hackers are just a migratory lifeform with a tropism for computers.
