Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:"we have lots and lots of open source around he (Score 2) 101

by MaxwellStreet (#47619265) Attached to: Microsoft's Olivier Bloch Explains Microsoft Open Source (Video)

In the Hadoop space, Microsoft has also worked with Hortonworks to expand the Apache Stinger, Tez, and ORC projects - among others.

Granted, they certainly want to make sure Hadoop runs on Windows servers and Azure; but nobody says that open source has to be an entirely altruistic affair.

Comment: Re:Seriously? (Score 1) 164

by MaxwellStreet (#33410774) Attached to: Microsoft's Security Development Process Under CC License

I'd suspect that there's plenty of common ground with the CERT set - good practices are good practices.

What I don't see in this discussion is an honest criticism of the SDL practices being published.

I have directly observed (from my position as a corporate developer that works somewhat closely with Microsoft) that the Microsoft's focus on security since 2003 is sincere and pervasive. They take security seriously.

While I'm no friend of ActiveX, the bleating demands that they scrap the .Net framework (or they're not serious about security) are laughable.

Publishing their internal secure development lifecycle process for all to see is an example of the transparency that is so often trumpeted as a feature of open source development. If you can find flaws in the SDL, I suspect that they'd be happy to discuss it with you. (They've been quite open with our company about their SDL for the past 3 years.)

Having a good process doesn't guarantee perfect results - and I don't think Microsoft is promising perfect results. No sane software development group would. I think this demonstrates an ongoing commitment to security - one that started years ago.

Simply pointing and laughing does not reflect well upon you. Criticize the Microsoft SDL - it's out there, with OSS-style transparency. Start a serious discussion - and offer up improvements, if you can.

Comment: Re:Stability (Score 1) 891

by MaxwellStreet (#29397979) Attached to: Why Users Drop Open Source Apps For Proprietary Alternatives

Here, in a nutshell, is why a lot of normal, non-technical users have trouble with FOSS...

They don't know anything about how and why Flash crashes their browser - or why Chrome handles it better.

They only know that their browser has crashed.

When someone more knowledgeable says "The problem isn't this, it's something else - so FIX YOUR COMPUTER before complaining" - well... the user just wants things to work, and their browser is still crashing.

Even if they had the time to dink around with their configuration until things were better, I don't think they're especially motivated in that direction. Most people don't enjoy messing around with their computers.

On the upside, your normal, non-technical user might not know enough to be offended by the PEBKAC remark.

Christmas Cheer

+ - What Did Neil Armstrong REALLY Say?

Submitted by slashmojo
slashmojo (818930) writes "For nearly four decades, Apollo 11 astronaut Neil Armstrong has been living under the accusation of mis-stating one of of the most famous phrases in history: "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind." Now, programmer Peter Shann Ford claims to have evidence (derived using the GoldWave software) that Armstrong did not botch the speech, but correctly included the alleged missing syllable. Armstrong, who found the evidence "persuasive", supports the findings."

Computer Science is merely the post-Turing decline in formal systems theory.