Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Online game (Score 1) 50

by MDMurphy (#40020051) Attached to: Kevin Bacon Meets Wikipedia With New Pathfinding Program

Can't get to the Slashdotted page, but this does sound like it could have been an interesting online phone game. Two people each pick a Wikipedia entry. Then both search for the path between them ( with some agreement on origin/destination ). The game itself keeping track of the number of steps.

Of course a site that automatically traces the path ruins this. It would probably also result in people salting pages with links to more generic ones.

Comment: It's "self-driving" (Score 1) 215

by MDMurphy (#39922155) Attached to: Google Gets Driverless License For Nevada Roads

As the sign on the back of the vehicle in the article shows it's "self driving". This is not as driverless or autonomous as has been applied to airplanes up till now. If / when cars like these are available to purchase, that's a big difference. This is essentially autopilot, though a pretty advanced one with collision avoidance. Airplanes have had autopilot for decades now, and they are viewed very differently from AUVs or drones.

The State of Nevada does refer to them as autonomous though. The requirement for two people though makes them far from driverless. The NV DMV site says that when these sort of cars are available for public use that motorists will need a special endorsement for their drivers license.

Australia

Australian Billionaire Plans To Build Titanic II 289

Posted by Soulskill
from the of-course-he-does dept.
SchrodingerZ writes "Just in time to miss the 100-year anniversary of the fatal voyage of the Titanic, Australian mining billionaire Clive Palmer announced he has plans to recreate the Titanic, calling it Titanic II. 'It will be every bit as luxurious as the original Titanic but of course it will have state-of-the-art 21st Century technology and the latest navigation and safety systems,' says Palmer. He stated it was to be as close to the original as possible, with some modern adjustments. Its maiden voyage is set for 2016."
Medicine

Dental X-Rays Linked To Common Brain Tumor 248

Posted by timothy
from the tradeoffs-are-everywhere dept.
redletterdave writes "A new study suggests people who had certain kinds of dental X-rays in the past may be at an increased risk for meningioma, the most commonly diagnosed brain tumor in the U.S. Dr. Elizabeth Klaus, the study's lead author and a professor at the Yale School of Medicine, discovered that dental X-rays are the most common source of exposure to ionizing radiation — which has been linked to meningiomas in the past — and that those diagnosed with meningiomas were more than twice as likely as a comparison group to report ever having had bitewing images taken. And regardless of the age when the bitewings were taken, those who had them yearly or more frequently were between 40 percent and 90 percent higher risk at all ages to be diagnosed with a brain tumor."

Comment: Loss of Carpool lane access (Score 5, Informative) 998

by MDMurphy (#39624229) Attached to: Hybrid Car Owners Not Likely To Buy Another Hybrid

People here in CA were nudged to get a hybrid in no small part due to the ability to get a sticker that allowed solo driver access to the HOV lanes. Once that went away, a big part of the incentive went with it. I know some people who sold their hybrids in advance of the change, anticipating that the car would sell for more while they still could use the lanes.

So while hybrid owners might be unlikely to buy another, it could be due in part that without the HOV lane access they wouldn't have bought one in the first place. The story then would be "Car buyers follow temporary gov't incentive, move on when incentive goes away"

Most hybrids didn't offer better economy in the long run, once the added cost was factored in. They relied heavily on other incentives to make them more desirable in the first place. I'm surprised that those incentives didn't show up in the survey, or at least weren't mentioned in the report.

Comment: Android + Prepaid Mobile + WiFi (Score 1) 508

You can buy an Android phone for a prepaid cell account for under $100. (used phones are doable too ) Various camera apps will do scene detection and emailing of stills or video or can do periodic image capture. Powered by a microUSB is easy enough, with it's internal battery as a backup for short power outages.

WiFi works fine, and with a home UPS will be up and running for most local power outages. Having a $X a day plan from the carrier will allow the mobile network to be used as a backup to the the WiFi without providing a continuous additional monthly bill.

Images / Video can be sent to an online email account, so while immediate notification can be on your own mobile, there's a ready built server for storing the images.

Arduino or similar hardware could be used as additional sensor inputs,or possibly an alarm output, but using built in cameras alone gives you a useful device out of the box.

Comment: Re:in other words... (Score 4, Insightful) 355

by MDMurphy (#39312651) Attached to: T-Mobile Exec Calls For End To Cell Phone Subsidies

That might be correct for other carriers, but T-Mobile does offer plans that are cheaper if they don't involve them "giving" you a new phone. Bring your own phone to them and you can get a lower rate. Do that with the other carriers and you get the same rate. If you get a subsidized phone you can switch to the cheaper plan when you're out of contract.

Apple tried to change the whole "free phone" mentality when the first iPhones were offered at full price, but that didn't last long. The G1 and Nexus One Android phones were also sold for full price. This didn't turn out to be popular as consumers were hooked on the 'free" or cheap phone prices.

When the ax entered the forest, the trees said, "The handle is one of us!" -- Turkish proverb

Working...