Comment: Re:And Harry Nyquist is rolling around in his grav (Score 2) 255
You can't improve audio quality of *audible frequencies* by increasing resolution of the horizontal axis (sampling frequency) beyond a rate which surpasses the Nyquist frequency for human hearing.
Nyquist-Shannon notwithstanding, the range of human hearing is wider than 20kHz.
http://www.cco.caltech.edu/~boyk/spectra/spectra.htm (a properly conducted experiment)
That said, doubling the sampling rate isn't going to do anything for a digital signal. At best, the new signal will simply play each of the old signal's samples twice.
Just because musical instruments produce frequencies above 20kHz (as shown in your link), it doesn't mean that the average human can hear them. Younger people can hear frequencies up to ~20kHz, and maybe a bit above, but most middle age adults probably cut off around 15kHz or lower. Here's one study showing 18-24 yr olds who can mostly hear 24kHz, but they're generating the sound at 117 dB -- a very dangerous level for more than just a few seconds. (http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/00206098409070087?journalCode=ija)
Listening to loud sounds (>85dB) for extended periods of time will decrease the high frequency response of the human ear, so I wonder if high frequency hearing in children and teens of the last decade or two will have even worse hearing that their parents due to the ubiquitous white ear buds.