Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Comment Connectome probably in a decade not centuries (Score 1) 263

A connectome could be done quite quickly within a decade -

freeze the head, shave it (plane off a slice through bone and brain) in thousandths of a mm increments and record the connections visually.

It probably will not be doable non destructively for a lot longer, but destructive should be quite easy.

Comment Re:People are idiots. (Score 2) 364

If there's one thing that popular TV has done for us lately, I'd say the show "Are You Smarter than a 5th Grader?" actually is a help because it gives us an idea of where we ALL *should* be educationally

The show is mostly useless trivia, so no it isn't 'where we all should be educationally'. If people never know about the majority of US Presidents, or specific dates of historic events, there would be absolutely no loss to education.

Comment Re:Not the server (Score 1) 348

CFR 1222 covering archival of Government communications was in effect from 2002, and State Department 12 FAM 541 to 12 FAM 545 covers sensitive but unclassified information (which includes things like meetings, schedules, promotions, personnel discussions) was in effect from 2005. She broke both of those, and they were in place for years before she was appointed SoS.

And if you had bothered to read these regulations you would see that she adhered to the letter of the law in both cases. An email was lawfully archived as long as she printed out the email or it was stored on a government server (any email she sent to government address would be stored on government servers, unless deleted by the recipient). The handling of senstive but unclassified information was in accordance with the law.

Comment Re:Educators are stupid (Score 1) 956

I have long been told that people can and do separate fiction from reality. That what we see on TV and in movies is known to be fictional and not real. I have never believed it for one minute.

I overhead a coversation between two people discussing Lucy, and they thought that you really could gain psychic powers etc, if only you could 'use the other 98% of the brain'.

Comment Re:Cyclists DON'T obey the law! (Score 1) 696

Bicyclists should wait at red lights just like everyone else, for example. It doesn't mean "stop, look, then proceed if you don't see a car crossing". It means you wait until it turns green.

In many states, bicycles are also allowed to cross during walk on crosswalks (actually it is often a city decision as opposed to state law). They don't necessarily have to follow the laws of motorised vehicles exclusively.

Comment Re:How could it possibly "work" for 300M people? (Score 1) 281

Slavery and other issues were just the hot button topics that got the average person engaged, that isn't really what it was about.

No that is revisionist history. It was purely about slavery. The states rights argument was created after the south lost because it was embarrassing to have fought for slavery.

Comment Re:How could it possibly "work" for 300M people? (Score 1) 281

For example the Nordic countries (and Germany until recently) don't have a minimum wage.

Austria, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden have nationwide collective bargaining that sets minimum wage per sector. They simply don't have government set minimum wage.

Netherlands has a minimum wage.

So you were wrong on all accounts - there are minimum wage levels, but they are set by nationwide collective bargaining instead of the state in most of these nations. The negotiated minimum wage is typically around US union wages - way higher (22-24$/hr) than even the 15$ per hour proposed by some US politicians and then health/dental are provided via taxes.

Comment Re:Lessig is Runnig? (Score 1) 281

The typo is my fault, sorry - the 'spelling error' highlighting either wasn't working or I overlooked it when I submitted - doh!

Interestingly he did do editing. I only submitted the first sentence and didn't have the link inline. He found the second source, quoted the explanatory paragraph, and added the linking.

Comment Re:Actually no (Score 2) 165

Clinical trials are not "cheap". They are usually the most expensive part of bringing a new drug to market.

The expensive trials are when we have a drug that treats the problem extremely well, the new drug appears to offer little or no benefit, and thus they have to offer people ridiculous sums of money to be recruited into the trial, and they have to have a enormous number of people enter the trial to show an effect size.

For trials where there is no effective treatment, and the new treatment should be highly effective, the cost of trials is quite modest.

Comment Re:total bullshit? (Score 2, Informative) 344

No, that's the problem. There were not only rules, but there were laws against what she was doing. Had you or I broken those laws, then ignored a federal order to turn over those e-mails and wiped our e-mail server instead, we'd be sitting in an iron cage right now.

According to the State Department she violated neither policies nor laws.

The retention laws only required that copies of relevent emails be saved but it didn't specify how - one of the ways that was accepted was printing out the emails, another was to CC a government email address that would retain the email.

There have been new laws, that were enacted two years after she left office that would now require usage of a government email address for correspondence or a copy of the correspondence to be on a government server within 15 days.

Comment Re:Total Innocence (Score 0) 344

Doesn't matter. First, she should have known that as SoS classified information would be flowing through that server.

It is illegal to send classifed information via email, whether via her private email or via her government email address.

Second, she was ordered by a court to turn over all her emails. She stonewalled as long as she could, then printed out some of the email (the ones she deemed 'important'), then wiped the server and claimed there were no backups

No she was not ordered to turn over all of her emails and a judge would not have the authority to make such an order. There was an FOIA regarding Bengazi, that the court issued an order regarding emails pertinent to Bengazi. FOIA though is only relevant for emails in possession of the State Department.

Comment Re:total bullshit? (Score 4, Informative) 344

Leaks or not, the law says she was supposed to use her secure government-provided email for work. She ignored that law.

No it didn't say that till two years after she left office. Also the government email isn't secure and can only be used for non secure communication. Secure communications require usage of an internal distribution server that is secure and is not actually email.

Your own mileage may vary.