Comment: Re:Survey? (Score 1) 347
I'm not sure it's wholly accurate, but I use it as a starting point for discussing the topic.
|
|
I'm not sure it's wholly accurate, but I use it as a starting point for discussing the topic.
But when you think about it, the manufactured kind of drama (brought to you by CNN, Fox News, drudgereport.com, et al) isn't necessarily malicious in and of itself, but only serves to capture eyeballs, thus advertising dollars.
I talked to someone who worked in a small Hollywood production company, and asked him about the preponderance of high-quality heavyweight fictional drama in the 2000's (pardon me if I list these together -- Deadwood, Buffy, Battlestar Galactica, etc). He felt that The Sopranos was the series that led this off, and I have a vague sense that the release of that show corresponded temporally to a change in the color and quantity of synthetic gravitas in both real and fictional mass media.
Was TV content a lot less heavy across the board prior to The Sopranos? Was it coincidence, or did it really change the balance of content, and the news sources you mention are examples of that change?
The lottery is a tax, often on the disadvantaged and least able to make rational decisions.
Some banks have floated the idea of it being almost an exact opposite. Interesting point about the disadvantaged being less able to make rational decisions possibly for other reasons than you'd think, assuming the mentioned research and conclusions hold in comparable situations.
As the relieved father of a young woman who has finally made it into her twenties
I could do with a book about awful stuff happening to horny teenage boys with adams apples and their parents' cars who are always hanging around trying to get daughters to go to parties at the homes of absent parents.
I may have to check out these books.
Make it myself? But I'm a physical organic chemist!