Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
The Internet

+ - Will You Say Yes?->

Submitted by
Matt
Matt writes "Will You Say Yes saves you the embarrassment of rejection by letting you see if that girl (or guy) you like is willing to go on a date with you.
For those with long-term partners it also lets you see if your partner is ready for marriage before you pop the ever-so-dangerous question.
Just hope that the love of your life hasn't lied to the website in order to humilaite you."

Link to Original Source

Comment: QWERTY, DVORAK, ABCDEF (Score 2, Informative) 638

by Krast0r (#14307936) Attached to: New Keyboard Has Just 53 Keys
As many of you will know, QWERTY was actually made to slow typists down (to most Slashdot readers however, it seems to have been ineffective) so an alphabetic arrangement, which was the original arrangement of letters on a typewriter AFAIK, would probably speed typing were anyone to learn it. However, some of you will have heard of the Dvorak keyboard layoyut, this was designed with speed in mind locating the most-used keys in the easiest to reach positions. (More about Dvorak: http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/). This seems to be almost stuck in the middle of two ideas: QWERTY being well-known; DVORAK being supposedly the best for speed and ergonomic typing. I'm not sure why anyone would buy this keyboard (or use this layout with another keyboard) although it could come in handy for teaching children to use computers - I know when I was first introduced to a computer I couldn't understand why the keys were where they were.

"All my life I wanted to be someone; I guess I should have been more specific." -- Jane Wagner

Working...