Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:So how about it, Slashdot? (Score 1) 247

by Koos (#34859154) Attached to: Major Sites To Join ‘World IPv6 Day’
According to Savvis invested in a new ipv6-capable network in 2006, to be finished in 2008. Savvis hosts sourceforge / slashdot (from the whois record). Yet, according to the nanog grapevine in 2010, Savvis is not yet able to offer IPv6 to customers. Time to put 'working ipv6' on the checklist for your new hosting?

Comment: Re:Flash security has always frightened me (Score 1) 355

by RAMMS+EIN (#30084370) Attached to: Flash Vulnerability Found, Adobe Says No Fix Forthcoming

``Browser vendors have the right incentives because users have a realistic choice of browsers. Flash is an all-or-nothing affair.''

And that is a real problem for users, and not just because of its effect on security. Only Adobe makes software that can handle all the Flash applets out there, and anytime there is only a single supplier, the incentives to make things better for customers aren't there. Adobe has been pretty nice with Flash, considering.

Comment: Re:The vulnerability (Score 1) 355

by RAMMS+EIN (#30084350) Attached to: Flash Vulnerability Found, Adobe Says No Fix Forthcoming

Seems to me there _is_ an easy fix: disable that behavior by default (why would you want it, anyway?). Then, for sites that are broken by it, allow it to be selectively enabled.

Of course, the fact that Adobe isn't fixing it and we aren't allowed to fix it nicely illustrates why having the whole world depend on a piece of proprietary software is a bad idea at least from a security point of view.

Comment: Why nobody has asked him yet about robots.txt (Score 1) 549

by Koos (#30078652) Attached to: Murdoch To Explore Blocking Google Searches
I too wondered "why hasn't anybody asked Mr. Murdoch about web standards for blocking bots like google", and asked such a question to the BBC who wrote the original article. The answer is simple: only news organizations like sky and fox news get the chance to interview him, and for some reason they never get around to asking questions like these that would not fit the views that Mr. Murdoch wants published as news.
Networking

Nominum Calls Open Source DNS "a Recipe For Problems" 237

Posted by Soulskill
from the dem's-fightin'-woids dept.
Raindeer writes "Commercial DNS software provider Nominum, in an effort to promote its new cloud-based DNS service, SKYE, has slandered all open source/freeware DNS packages. It said: 'Given all the nasty things that have happened this year, freeware is a recipe for problems, and it's just going to get worse. ... So, whether it's Eircom in Ireland or a Brazilian ISP that was attacked earlier this year, all of them were using some variant of freeware. Freeware is not akin to malware, but is opening up those customers to problems.' This has the DNS community fuming. Especially when you consider that Nominum was one of the companies affected by the DNS cache poisoning problem of last year, something PowerDNS, MaraDNS and DJBDNS (all open source) weren't vulnerable to."

Nominum calls Open Source DNS 'a recipe for proble

Submitted by
Raindeer
Raindeer writes "In an effort to promote its new Cloud based DNS service SKYE, Nominum one of the commercial DNS-software, providers slaundered all open source/freeware DNS packages. It said: "Given all the nasty things that have happened this year, freeware is a recipe for problems, and it's just going to get worse.(....) So, whether it's Eircom in Ireland or a Brazilian ISP that was attacked earlier this year, all of them were using some variant of freeware. Freeware is not akin to malware, but is opening up those customers to problems. " This has the DNS community fuming. Especially when you know Nominum was one of the companies affected by the DNS Cache poisoning problem of last year. Something PowerDNS, MaraDNS and DJBDNS all open source weren't vulnerable too."

Comment: Re:Recycle them (Score 1) 546

by Koos (#27147791) Attached to: What To Do With Old USB Keys, Low-Capacity Hard Drives?

Securely wipe them if you must

Securely wipe them even if you intend to store them for a while until you get better use for them or will throw them away. It's boring work, but you're making sure no private data gets out. Even a simple operating system installation has a store of encrypted passwords which can be abused.

Security

Spying on the TOR anonymisation network->

Submitted by
juct
juct writes "The long standing suspicion, that the anonymizing network TOR is (ab)used to catch sensitive data by Chinese, Russian and American government agencies as well as hacking groups gets new support. Members of the Teamfurry community found TOR exit-nodes which only forward unencrypted versions of certain protocols. These peculiar configurations invite speculation as to why they are set up in this way. Another tor exit node has been caught doing MITM attacks using fake SSL certificates."
Link to Original Source

Be free and open and breezy! Enjoy! Things won't get any better so get used to it.

Working...