Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Note: You can take 10% off all Slashdot Deals with coupon code "slashdot10off." ×

Comment Re:I volunteer as tribute. (Score 1) 380

1800 calories and you didnt loose weight?, with that training you are mentioning, that would make your loose weight and basically probably starve your muscle you would get less weight just because your body is eating its own muscles up.

fat cells are a bitch to get rid of, well they say you cant loose them, so if you are fat when growing up you will have more fat cells than if you had been "normal" weighted when growing up, and the only way to get rid of fat cells is to do liposuction, at adult age they can shrink when dieting, but not all of them will shrink and the fatter a cell is, it will more harder to shrink them

as you said you were training, did you then pull more and more weight and could do the cardio better?, because as said, muscles weights more than fat and at 1800 calories with that much training would have done more damage to a body than good and in that process lost weight

Comment Re:I volunteer as tribute. (Score 0) 380

Why dont you do that?, it seems that you just seek that others do the job for you, you could put up that weight(well if needed) and then go on a "proper" regime + workout and see if it works?, its not like you need any special machines or equipment for that

look up Drew Manning, well he did more than just "proper" regimen

Comment Re:I volunteer as tribute. (Score 1, Flamebait) 380

It is still a proper regimen, but the fat lazy bastards dont follow it correctly or at all but that doesnt invalidate the regimen, it is still correct.

The most important thing is that there is no universal "proper" regimen and they have to be adjusted to the individual, biological, social and economic.

Well if you do alot of exercise you will stay your weight or go up, because, you know what?, muscles weight more than fat * gasp *

Comment Re:Only? (Score 1) 664

How can I from ground know if the drone was to high up for me to been seen in clear?, there are different cameras that have good optic zoom, how do I know there is only one camera?, you are just trying to justify that the drone operator was correct on assumptions when this happened, you know now by the video of what the drone saw, but the thing is that you need to know this things when this was happening, not after

a lot of the discussion of the ones defending the drone operator seem to be on that what he did was ok becuase the drone was in high altitude, was not so long in the property etc, not what is legally, lets just wait for what the court says

and that he didnt ask for permission or warn his neighbourhood is fucking bad manner and rude

i think drones are cool and all, but with morons not checking out what is legal in the first place should have their drones taken away from them and charged if possible, morons like this destroy for the rest because this things lead to more draconian regulations

Comment Re:How? (Score 1) 381

I would actually trust the major pornsites more than any politician to hold my cc-information, the thing is if someone links a good gallery of midget utensil porn to a smaller site where I would need to put my cc-information, should I trust it, if I never been there before?, I could either go with a loss of money or a loss of not seeing said porn.

All Finagle Laws may be bypassed by learning the simple art of doing without thinking.

Working...