By forcing users to enter $0 when they download, don't they make the users implicitly commit to a statement that the software is worthless?
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
... when they attempted to regulate the value of Pi.
There was more to that story though.
The guy was pretty good at managing his Chinese programmer. I've rescued enough projects that were initiated by clients who hired cheap coders to suggest that your average non-techie manager is not going to succeed at doing the same.
So it's really a story about the rare breed of local programmers who are able to make $20k/year code grunts produce useful things instead of spaghetti. The savings aren't that spectacular upon factoring that in.
Oh, and there are intellectual property considerations to factor in as well. When selecting the very cheapest labor, you occasionally run into full time employees who are in fact working two or three "full time" jobs in addition to the occasional eLance jobs and what have you.
There's a call to rename every French paper "Charlie Hebdo" tomorrow in protest.
http://www.lalibre.be/actu/int... (in French)
Sadly, though, not all carriers offer to disable voice-mail.
Yeah, just be careful with the baby pics
Sheesh... The US gets crazier by the year...
The reason it's special is because it was social. Had you worked prior to the internet being mainstream, you'd fully appreciate how going through your network of contacts and various venues for information can yield tremendous other contact and business opportunities.
Google may have simplified the process of locating information online, but at the same time it *decreased* the amount of social interactions, to a point where the typical 20-something youngster is scared sh*tless of picking up a phone to call someone.
It actually has to do with keeping know-how in-house. Consider Airbus, then consider Boeing. One is all EU-based. The other outsources in Asia. Wanna take a bet on who goes bust first?
3... 2... 1...
Looks prettier than Canadian tar sands imho. And I imagine less harmful than hydraulic fracking.
Companies are already applying US and EU laws and norms every day. Because, well... taken as a single entity, the EU is actually a bigger economy than the US, and the US is still significantly bigger than China -- whose laws a whole slew of firms comply with as well.
Truth is, it doesn't really matter if your laws don't apply globally in theory when you're a big economy. Firms will apply your laws anyway.
One more: immutable.
Most of them are made with natural, plant-based ingredients.
Cyanide is present in apricot, apple and peach seeds -- it's a natural, plant-based ingredient. That doesn't make it healthy.
An egg, in contrast, contains everything you need to turn a single cell into a grown chick. It's probably healthy.
"Hampton Creek is a food technology company that makes food healthier by utilizing a specially made egg substitute in food products."
Why would an egg be unhealthy? Leaving anecdotical and not-so-anecdotical data aside, that little shell arguably contains every nutrient needed to turn a single cell into a full blown and healthy chick.
"Hampton Creek's latest product is called, Just Cookies, which is an eggless chocolate chip cookie dough"
Sounds like something sugary... That would be healthy?
Wouldn't the target government's obvious reaction be to block Amnesty International's site? Or worse, to masquerade as their site in order to distribute spyware?