It is racism. It doesn't matter if the end result of that racism is curing cancer, saving the world or all predjudice, etc. It doesn't change the fact that it's racism. Just because the end result is good doesn't mean racism isn't racism any more.
You sound incredibly angry. How DARE someone make a script that counts instances of "ugly hacks". IT IS A DISGRACE TO POINT OUT THINGS WE ALREADY KNOW. HAVE THESE PEOPLE NO DECORUM?
If it's encrypted properly it's basically impossible for anyone to break into it.
reddit comment explains why this is useful https://www.reddit.com/r/techn...
If you want to advance mathematics you must show your working.
Not really. Much like how calling someone a "keyboard warrior" doesn't imply keyboards are bad, calling someone a "social justice warrior" isn't meant to imply that social justice is bad.
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.... The author admits that the nemesis (perfect enemy) of this bot would have a win rate of 0.05bb/100 (this is extremely small). So it is not technically solved, but it's close enough.
In terms of game theory, the strategy is optimal.
It will never work like you think it does. It will never fold 100% to a bet in any scenario. It will fold a probability between 0 and 100. Maybe 30% maybe 70%. It is the perfect strategy in the sense that even though you know the strategy entirely you can still lose. I can tell you my entire tic tac toe strategy. And yet you will still be unable to defeat me, though you may lose if you make mistakes. This is how the bot is. You can only hope to draw with it.
They aren't. Some women see people attacking them and assume "They're attacking me because I'm a woman". And the media loves to play this narrative. The real reason people get harassed isn't because of their gender, it's because they're idiots.
http://www.evanmiller.org/how-... This was linked before on slasdot IIRC. This is basically a blog post saying "hey this can be used on steam too, not just amazon!"
Perhaps its more of a fasion statement than for practicality. Sort of like beats headphones *smirk*.
I'm tired of hearing this "companies exist only to maximize profits" garbage. Companies are controlled by people. People do not exist to maximize how much money they can make, therefore they are free to choose to control a company in a way such that it does something less profitable but more moral. There's never any proof that it's why companies exist anyway. It's just an 'edgy' way to look at society ('companies don't care about you, they only want profits'), but where is the proof that companies must maximize profits at all costs? It's just always asserted without any evidence or reasoning. It is a net loss to society if all companies exploited loopholes and so forth.
>Granted I'm not a language expert/theorist, but most of us that code for a living aren't. What exactly do you mean by this?
Why do you have such a problem with the state compelling you to pay for something you might not like? That's the entire basis of the tax system. From what you've written it seems to follow that you're against all taxes.