Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:Blocking AdBlock (Score 3, Insightful) 282

by Kardos (#49527013) Attached to: German Court Rules Adblock Plus Is Legal

> This is further compounded by some websites sticking up a dialog box telling me to register or "Like" them on Facebook if I want to continue browsing their content.

No loss there. It's a safe bet that it's not content of any quality if users have to be coerced into announcing that they "like" it before they see it.

Comment: Re:Rule #1, don't taunt happy fun hackers (Score 1) 58

by Kardos (#49483681) Attached to: Why "Designed For Security" Is a Dubious Designation

It sounds like your approach to security is to risk manage it, like the car companies in Fight Club. Doing "some security stuff" and then keeping quiet and crossing your fingers hoping that nobody takes an interest does not inspire confidence. If a recreational hacker can defeat your security on a whim just to show off, you don't stand a chance against actual criminals who will quietly break your security and then proceed to exploit you for everything they can and for as long as they can.

> Maybe you are secure in your components or your not, but don't go looking for people to try and break you.

Actually that's exactly what you do. Look up "bug bounty".

Comment: Three major problems with this idea (Score 0) 160

by Kardos (#49330645) Attached to: Energy Company Trials Computer Servers To Heat Homes

1) Security. You're going to have to come up with something really fancy (read expensive) so keep the homeowners and any of their guests/kids from tampering with it. Also keep it a secret, $Xk of gear would be a good target for thieves.
2) Reliability. Even a halfway competent datacentre will have very high reliable power and networking. Some guy's house? I'd wager less so.
3) Like everyone else said, warm seasons.

So, if you need to host something that doesn't require any security and you're happy with poor uptime, it's could be an option...

Comment: Re:Overstamp First? (Score 2) 133

by Kardos (#49099669) Attached to: Crystal Pattern Matching Recovers Obliterated Serial Numbers From Metal

You'd want to match the force used on the original stamp, else your 'decoy' numbers and letters will leave crystal deformation pattern that differs in intensity from the real digits. Probably easy if you're the manufacturer, but a touch harder if you're some guy with a hammer.

Comment: Re:Any criticism? (Score 3, Insightful) 125

by Kardos (#48525721) Attached to: Consumer-Grade SSDs Survive Two Petabytes of Writes

The only weakness is that it needs to be repeated on newer ssds as they hit the market. The results of this test are relevant for drives released back when the experiment started in 2013, less so for drives released now and even less so for future drives. As the manufacturers realise that the drives are lasting much longer than they are specified to, they'll decide they are overengineered and rework them to wear out quicker. Aside from the obvious cost cutting benefit, it also keeps the market segmented in various grades between "low end consumer ssds" and "high end enterprise ssds".

Comment: Re:In my experience - (Score 2) 488

by Kardos (#48503909) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Non-Coders, Why Aren't You Contributing To Open Source?

> For bug tracking and reporting issues my experience has been either I get no response or I don't have the capabilities to supply the developer with the information they need to track the bug down.

You don't need to find the bug.... you just need to make it reproducible. A reproducible bug report is essentially as good as finding the bug itself; once the dev can follow your steps to reproduce it, he'll find it in short order. If you're getting no response, it's either a dead project, or your report is not specific enough. There's no upper limit on the time investment needed to solve a "it crashed when I was using it", but "it crashed when I open this file" is readily fixed.

"Oh what wouldn't I give to be spat at in the face..." -- a prisoner in "Life of Brian"