Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Stop Being Pedantic (again) (Score 1) 463

by JLDohm (#39956653) Attached to: The Rise of Chemophobia In the News

What do you really mean by "in nature" and why do you think it's superior to whatever else it is that you've arbitrarily defined not to have the status "in nature"? It sure seems to me that the "nature" is used here as some sort of magical/mystical distinction rather than anything real and tangible.

Please. It's like you can't understand the difference between a runners high and a heroine injection.

The chemicals that humans were exposed to in significant concentrations were basically unchanged for a hundred thousand years or more. Those chemicals which have increased in concentration in our immediate environment since the advent of agriculture (or the industrial revolution, if you prefer) are hereby deemed non-natural chemicals for the purpose of this discussion.

Comment: Re:Stop Being Pedantic (Score 1) 463

by JLDohm (#39956377) Attached to: The Rise of Chemophobia In the News

This isn't just pedantry. The problem with co-opting scientific words to have a different mainstream meaning is that it reduces people's ability to read and understand science. Someone might find a scientific article that talks about a new type of (soap, pesticide, fuel, spice) but calls it a chemical. The naive reader is immediately convinced that this new product is unsafe. This causes politicians to make bad policy decisions too.

Good point. I still maintain that all the self congratulatory posts about dihydrogen monoxide were missing the point. To often we are pedantic instead of merely precise.

Comment: Re:Stop Being Pedantic (Score 1) 463

by JLDohm (#39945819) Attached to: The Rise of Chemophobia In the News

Except you are MADE OF chemicals, and not MADE OF snakes

I was MADE BY a trouser snake. Is that close enough?

But seriously, it isn't a perfect analogy. I suppose the real question is this: Which is worse, assuming things are harmful until proven otherwise, or assuming things are safe until proven otherwise? (or somewhere in the middle that I am too lazy to define exactly).

Comment: Stop Being Pedantic (Score 5, Insightful) 463

by JLDohm (#39944499) Attached to: The Rise of Chemophobia In the News
Yes, they are using the word "chemicals" wrong. Get over it. Use your brain to substitute something that is correct and listen to what they are saying. Just because they paint all chemicals as evil, and they are wrong, does not mean that all chemicals are safe. With snakes, I assume they are poisonous unless I know otherwise. Why not do the same with things I put in my body?

Nothing in progression can rest on its original plan. We may as well think of rocking a grown man in the cradle of an infant. -- Edmund Burke

Working...