|
|
Sorry thats a cop-out. we can generally agree on how to procced with the most important things like energy, and making a living. But you have to be living from your heart and not from a place of fear to understand that.
The same goes for Socialism. People thing because it was abused by corrupt governments that it is some how evil. Not many people bother to look at it without all the history behind how it was used.
LOL are you serious? They are all in the same shell game. Selling out the American people to the highest bidder. Nothing is going to change untill we demand that the bankers be removed from office and be run by people who are looking out for the people, not corporations.
I can believe there is so much idiocy in this county, its pretty insane.
Its a big lie because it has been used as a way to keep dictators in power. Stalin used it as a way to force farmers into collectives, providing for the government's selfish agenda before they could have share to live off of. It was a way to starve people off to make them desperate so they would be much more likely to give in..
Implementing socialism for certain functions that we absolutely depend on would be a benefit (As we do now in the United States with energy and medicare) if was put into the hands of the people for the people. Once you allow selfish people to consolidate power it always ends up corrupting the system, regardless of what kind of system it is.
You really dont understand what socialism is, you just heard things about it and repeat as if its fact like 90% of the rest of the sheep in this country. Governments are run by people you dont blame the system for its problems you blame the people who are running it, and ultimately the people who put them their in the first place. Which is, unfortunately us. We dont have enough people in the world who want to understand what is happening behind the scenes. And this is why there is so much corruption in the world today. People tend to want to be controlled by others because they dont want to take real responsibility for there life.
That's almost true, but not quite. We have nobody to blame but our selves. Everybody has the ability to create a life free from the bullshit of corporatism. Two things come to mind: 1. Learning to conquer fear by undoing domestication in your own life though self-reflection which creates clarity of mind. 2. handling power responsibly by recognizing the destructive tenancies of self-importance. Once you overcome the enemies these enemies you are able to generate wealth though your own creativity, and you wont sabotage it.
This would be great if only it was the intention of government to stop 9/11 incidents. The reality is that this is a way for government to control the ability of people from leaving country when the economical shit hits the fan.
If your car can talk to lights there is a good chance they can use it to id cars on the road. Where and when.
And if people reacted like this more often, you'd even force corporations to do less questionable things. It's not a boycott of a bad company, it's a boycott against a single bad policy to discourage it. If people boycotted companies "selectively" more often, some would use this as an advantage to gain customers over one of their policies, next over the other, and eventually push their competition to do the same
In my view, if a company has a history of supporting polices that are bad for its customers, then by definition it is a bad company. They maybe able to mend there ways in the future and then opinion can change. But until they can show me they are in line with basic human rights there is no quarter to the amount of bad press I will bring to their door step by speaking to my friends and family, writing bad reviews and the like. activism like this done on a small scale does make a difference, its just harder to quantify in the near future and the long term.
The debate rages on: Is PL/I Bachtrian or Dromedary?