Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: What's with the hate? (Score 1) 487

by IntergalacticWalrus (#29865939) Attached to: Ryan Gordon Wants To Bring Universal Binaries To Linux

Fat binaries are awesome, they're what makes Mac OS X the mainstream operating system with the most painless 64-bit transition. Whereas Windows and Linux use messy hacks to allow 32-bit apps to live in a 64-bit environment, in OS X it "just works" because all libraries are multi-architecture in a completely transparent way thanks to fat binaries. It also made the transition from PPC to x86 relatively easy, too.

I feel sorry for people who believe Linux doesn't need fat binaries. They don't understand all the advantages this system brings (and not just to non-free software).

Comment: Re:Only useful for non-free applications (Score 1) 487

by IntergalacticWalrus (#29865833) Attached to: Ryan Gordon Wants To Bring Universal Binaries To Linux

If I'm reading you correctly, what you're saying is that because the source is available, it's perfectly acceptable to expect the end user to compile everything? I can already hear you say "no, the end user should use his distro's package manager". But the hard reality is that your distro's package manager doesn't have everything. Eventually you always end up with some program that's not being maintained by your distro. Hence the forced compiling of stuff.

The end user should NEVER have to compile stuff to use it. EVER. (except for experimental code not ready for release) People need to get that silly idea out of their heads if they ever want Linux to become a relevant desktop operating system.

Fat binaries would be just as useful for open source apps as closed ones.

Comment: Re:Fat-Source Bundles (Score 1) 487

by IntergalacticWalrus (#29865797) Attached to: Ryan Gordon Wants To Bring Universal Binaries To Linux

Great... except having to compile an app to install it is a fucking waste of the user's time. And the performance gains from CPU specific compile flags are insignificant. Why is this a better idea than fat binaries again?

Are you a Gentoo user? I used to be a Gentoo user too. Then I actually became sane.

Comment: Re:Only useful for non-free applications (Score 0, Flamebait) 487

by IntergalacticWalrus (#29865669) Attached to: Ryan Gordon Wants To Bring Universal Binaries To Linux

Please elaborate.

I too agree that this is pointless for the end user in Linux, at least when it comes to free software. Only closed binary blobs will benefit, which IMHO is not something worth putting effort towards helping. They did their design choices and accepted the reality in doing so.

He doesn't need to elaborate. Your continued narrow thinking has just proved his point. But if you want to live in denial, your choice.

Wii

+ - Homebrew Launcher for Wii Released

Submitted by Croakyvoice
Croakyvoice (986312) writes "Datel have finally released their all in one Homebrew launcher for the Nintendo Wii and Gamecube, the launcher consists of software CD, 1GB high-speed SD card, a USB SD card adapter and an SD media adapter to fit in your Cube's memory card slot. The easiest and legal way to play Emulators and Homebrew on the Nintendo Wii."

I don't have any use for bodyguards, but I do have a specific use for two highly trained certified public accountants. -- Elvis Presley

Working...