even though regulatorsadmittedin theFederal Registerthat no evidence indicated the truck-mounted beacons would be less safe. Such a study is now underway, but it's unclear how long it will take to draw any conclusions.
The company wants the regulations changed? Fine as soon as THEY provide evidence that the proposed change is NOT less safe. At this point according to the article there has been no study to indicate how safe their proposed changes are compared to existing regulations. So why should the change be made?
Mi crosoft
C ontrols
U You
There are usually two things you can do: Document the hell out of the situation and hope someone will agree with you OR work hard to make the asshole look good hoping he/she will get promoted and a better boss will take over.
Or white mutiny. Do your job and don't do anything extra that makes your boss look good. Let their behaviour ruin them. Been there done that to a drunken boss who got really snarky with me one day for not "doing her job fast enough" when to do so would have stopped all work for the last hours of the day. Took 90 days for her to be fired, as I predicted.
You can thank unions for that 40-hour week, as well as weekends, paid holidays, vacation, lunches and breaks.
The very Socialism that the Republicans scream constantly is destroying America.
 The confederate flag that made the news looked staged. It was carried by a man wearing a balaclava, no one else in the crowd was wearing a mask.
There was more than one. One of the ones I saw also had a sign indicating he was against "Tranny", I assumed he couldn't spell Tyranny but with all the American fears of trans people that have shown up since then maybe I was wrong.
As opposed to the left's belief that Trump is literally Hitler? Both sides are insanely stupid, including you.
Have you read Mein Kampf? Trumps actions are straight out of it. What isn't from it is from 1984 by Orwell.
When the majority of the placards carried in a protest in Azerbaijan are in frelling **English** the origin of the "movement" is pretty obvious.
The same for the "Truckers Convoy" in Canada. Way too many Confederate flags. Not to mention one of them in court trying to plead the 5th amendment.
"International Law" now means just about nothing. What's Canada going to do with that lawbreaking? Take it to a US court?.
Canada fought Bush II 's softwood lumber tariffs and won at every step. That didn't get them revoked. A deal was finally made but Trump broke it. The Republicans think they are above any agreements.
I recently got a mobility scooter. Its speed is limited to 4mph.
Maybe e-bikes should be limited thusly. Slow everyone the fuck down.
At that speed a 2 wheeled vehicle is not stable you will wobble all over the path endangering everyone else.
E-bikes ARE mopeds by definition. MOter / PEDal powered vehicles. They should be regulated as such.
Here at least mopeds have a LEGAL definition, part of which is the ability to go a maximum of 50 kmh. E-bikes are limited to 32 kmh. Most likely your area has (or should have) a legal definition of these terms. Of course the cops here have tried to define an e-bike missing a pedal as an unlicensed motorcycle but EVENTUALLY the courts told them NO.
What annoys me most is that motorized electric vehicles are allowed in pedestrian spaces. This should be changed.
Sure thing lets put those electric wheelchairs and utility scooters for the handicapped in traffic with cars and transport trucks. Maybe you should be more specific?
I now consider e-bikes to be the most likely vehicle I'm going to be hit by, either as a pedestrian or a biker, because they're fast and often times *practically silent*.
A conventional bike can be faster than a legal e-bike and is just as silent. I used to cycle at speeds of up to 38 mph (never had a bike that wouldn't start to shake too hard at that speed to go faster) and the only time my e-bike ever reached that speed was on a long steep hill. I've had groups of cyclists going by me on a shared path with a 15 kmh speed limit doing about 3 times that yell at me (doing 15) "Your dangerous on here", who was the dangerous one? Me obeying the law or them at 3 times the speed and their heads down only occasionally looking where they were going?
Want to ride but are too lazy to pedal? Fuck you, drive in the street with the other motor vehicles, fucktard. You have no business on the sidewalk and the bike lanes. Incidentally, die in a battery fire while you're at it, disgusting tub-o-lard.
Have you considered that some of these e-bike riders may have INJURIES (not related to cycling) which prevent them from pedalling? I'm in that category (though I don't currently have an e-bike). Pedalling a bike makes that injury permanently worse. It isn't laziness but injury. Here the e-bikes have limits that mean quite often cyclists would pass me by. Others may not be able to afford a car (or have a place to park it) or just not like driving.
On the dog issue I've seen dog owners off one side of a biking path in the dark with no lights and their dog on LONG leashes off the other side of the path with no consideration that a cyclist might come along and not see that thin leash in the dark. Many times it has only been my being very aware of the fact people might come out of the bushes had me see something (not always aware of what) and come to a near stop that allowed me to avoid injuring the poor dog (and myself). But it was the dog owner breaking the law not me.
I don't really care what you see, the statistics don't lie.
But liars do statistics. When presenting statistics on the increase of e-bike injuries they never like to give the comparison to the increase in e-bikes. More e-bikes should mean more e-bike injuries but in the cases I have seen the rise in injuries is far slower than the rise in e-bikes. As e-bikes become more common people in general (drivers, cylcists and pedestrians not just riders) become more used to them and the accident rate compared to the number of e-bikes DROPS.
The star of riches is shining upon you.