Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Hooray. (Score 0) 217

by Infernal Device (#40109597) Attached to: ISS Captures SpaceX Dragon Capsule

Learn the difference between figurative language and literal language.

The British empire handed over the duties of ocean exploration to private companies, who were more interested in making a buck (pound/guinea) than in serving the public interest. That they did serve the public interest was a secondary effect, but not the intended effect.

Comment: Re:Gearing up for war??? (Score 3, Insightful) 116

The only time you need factories like this is n preparation for a global conflict.

Is the DoD expecting WWIII?

That's kind of their job. Expect the worst, hope for the best.

These are the guys who make contingency plans for just about everything, so on some level, yes, they probably are expecting WWIII.

Comment: Opinion =/= Fact (Score 1) 326

by Infernal Device (#40043667) Attached to: Geeks In the Public Forum?

> What they shouldn't do is say: 'I want to reduce drug use, and sending all users to prison is the most cost-effective way to achieve that.' That's not at moral call, it's a factual statement; as such it should be evidence-based, or else the person making it should shut the hell up."

That is opinion, which can be driven by facts, but the two are never the same.

Comment: Re:Wrath of Apple fanbois (Score 1) 215

by Infernal Device (#39548143) Attached to: Ashton Kutcher To Play Steve Jobs In Upcoming Film

And thousand of fanbois goes "nutso" because Ashton isn't "deep" enough to play first class prima donna Jobs :)

If serious about that (and I don't know if this ain't still April Fools) Ashton have really good look alike similarity to early Jobs, he has good screen energy (yeah, I know it gets wasted on lot of useless things, but still - he has charisma), and I guess he is really aching to prove himself as good actor. And material is interesting - Jobs was complex persona. Maybe it will work, I don't know.

Anyway, as any artistic rendering - you can watch it, you can pirate it, you can ignore it. Your choice.

It isn't because he's not deep.

It's because Ashton Kutcher is a bad actor.

Comment: Re:Transcripts (Score 2) 96

I second this comment.

As a general rule, I try to skim once to find pertinent information and skip over filler content, something that is next-to-impossible with video. Having a transcript makes this much easier (especially in Q&A sessions).

Additionally, I can take in the content as time allows, with minimal backtracking to pick up the context when I have to break away to do something else.

Comment: Re:Lax attitudes toward child pornography (Score 1) 722

by Infernal Device (#39019043) Attached to: Reddit: No More Suggestive Content Featuring Minors

There has to be a line drawn between OMG-FREEDOM-AT-ALL-COSTS and posting sexual pictures of children. Living in a civil society requires some level of protection of the innocent. Reddit should shut the hell up about slippery slopes and do what it should have done six freaking years ago.

And where is that line? Obviously, someone younger than 18 is off-limits, except in countries where they're not ... persons 18 or older are legal, even if they appear younger, by US law (you can't make having a certain appearance illegal) ... from the age of 15 onwards, it's nearly impossible to judge actual age from appearance because it can vary wildly (the I-thought-she-was-18) ...

I'm not seeing any bright lines in there.

Advice is a dangerous gift; be cautious about giving and receiving it.

Working...