Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:Surprise? (Score 1) 560

by Imsdal (#47701679) Attached to: Munich Reverses Course, May Ditch Linux For Microsoft

The top 1 item is VBA in Excel. If you don't have that, you can't get the power users to switch, and if the power users don't switch, you won't be successful. I've said it before and I'll say it again, this time in a mad Ballmer voice: Excel, Excel, Excel. If Linux would have a better spreadsheet option for power users, the entire financial sector would switch in a heartbeat, and the rest of the world would soon follow.

However, it turns out that it's actually hard to build something that is better than Excel. Really, really hard. Don't hold your breath waiting for this.

Comment: Re:Surprise? (Score 3, Insightful) 560

by Imsdal (#47701665) Attached to: Munich Reverses Course, May Ditch Linux For Microsoft
It's not 1% of the top users, but probably 5%-15%. And if what you offer isn't good enough for the 5%-15% top users, what you offer isn't usable in the entire organization. And if it isn't usable in the entire organization, it isn't usable at all. MS has known this all along. The FOSS movement still hasn't udnerstood it. Sad, really.

Comment: Re:Surprise? (Score 3, Interesting) 560

by Imsdal (#47701655) Attached to: Munich Reverses Course, May Ditch Linux For Microsoft

Just wrong. For what most people do, LibreOffice is just fine.

That may or may not be true, but it most definitely isn't true at all for power users, and especially so for power users of Excel. These users may not be representable of a typical user, but they are the ones actually running the business and they have enormous power. Suggesting that LibreOffice is "just fine" for these people is ignorant, and also the reason Linux won't make it on the desktop. If you don't even try to understand your users, what you offer isn't going to be good enough.

Comment: Re:So? (Score 2, Insightful) 351

by Imsdal (#46703283) Attached to: Isolated Tribes Die Shortly After We Meet Them
It's more healthy to live in the stone age because why, exactly? Average life span has tripled since the stone age, and that is generally considered the best proxy for health there is.

Also, the idea that we work more now than we did in the stone age is also completely wrong. A regular employee works ~1600 hours/year for ~40 years. That's less than 10% of their time. Stone age people certainly worked more than 10% of their lives (even though I agree that it may be a myth that they worked most of the time.)

Comment: Re:Won't work (Score 1) 342

by Imsdal (#46702409) Attached to: Australia May 'Pause' Trades To Tackle High-Frequency Trading
You completely miss the very obvious point that information from other sources may have a bearing on the value of a company. If I spot a trend in the subway I may draw the conclusion that some companies stand to gain more from that trend than other companies. Your static view of the world is way too simplified.

Comment: Re:alas ! (Score 2) 60

by Imsdal (#46522845) Attached to: Lego Robot Solves Rubik's Cube Puzzle In 3.253 Seconds
As others have pointed out, the optimal solution is never more than 20 moves, and this instance required a bit more than 20 moves, so it probably wasn't the very easiest of configurations. That said, I don't understand why this record isn't for "best average of 20 runs" (or some other suitable number). It wouldn't take more than five minutes to run it, and it would be a lot more telling about the actual capacity of the robot.

It would also be interesting to see the variance of the solving times. How consistent is this thing?

Comment: Re:Those damn socialist! (Score 1) 752

by Imsdal (#45398571) Attached to: Sweden Is Closing Many Prisons Due to Lack of Prisoners

I'm really not sure what you are getting at here. Have you never heard of anyone using cocaine or heroin without doing stupid things? I have. In fact, only a very small percentage of usage leads to people doing stupid things. Conversely, surely you have heard of someone doing outrageously stupid things after drinking alcohol? There are in fact TV shows dedicated to this very phenomenon!

As for your discussion about the level of addictiveness, alcohol is more addictive than many drugs.

Make sure your code does nothing gracefully.