Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

+ - How RFID can help robots identify objects, bring us closer to internet of things->

Submitted by Hallie Siegel
Hallie Siegel (2948665) writes "How do robots find things in their environment? Some use vision systems, or lasers. But researchers at Georgia Tech have shown how small Ultra High Frequency (UHF) Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) tags can be used to help robots detect and identify hidden objects. This could allow a robot to find a bottle of medication in a cupboard, for example, and make sure it’s the correct medication before bringing it to the person who needs it. In the future, these tags will be augmented with better energy, sensing and computation capabilities, and could provide a smart environment for robots to interact with — a practical step toward the Internet of Things.

In this interview, Sabine Hauert speaks with Travis Deyle about his IROS-nominated work on RFID tags, his blog Hizook, and the career path that brought him from academia, to founding his own start-up, and finally working for Google[x], where he was part of the team that made the “smart contact lens” to measure tear glucose levels (recently licensed to Novartis)."

Link to Original Source

+ - New long-range RFID technology helps robots find household objects

Submitted by HizookRobotics
HizookRobotics (1722346) writes "Georgia Tech researchers announced a new way robots can “sense” their surroundings through the use of small ultra-high frequency radio-frequency identification (UHF RFID) tags. Inexpensive self-adhesive tags can be stuck on objects, allowing an RFID-equipped robot to search a room for the correct tag’s signal, even when the object is hidden out of sight. Once the tag is detected, the robot knows the object it’s trying to find isn’t far away. The researchers' methods, summarized over at IEEE's website by Evan Ackerman: The robot goes to the spot where it got the hottest signal from the tag it was looking for, zeroing in on it based on the signal strength that its shoulder antennas are picking up: if the right antenna is getting a stronger signal, the robot yaws right, and vice versa."

Comment: Tesla Cars are Grid Storage (Score 2) 151

by HizookRobotics (#46687757) Attached to: Tesla: A Carmaker Or Grid-Storage Company?
If Tesla makes the cars' power bidirectional, the excess capacity of cars plugged in for recharging (essentially) becomes a grid-connected battery itself. I recall seeing homebrew electric cars used as "generators" during brownouts a few years back. Tesla could do this on a massive scale using individuals' cars -- and pass some of the gains (peak power) back to the car owners.

Comment: Same robot hand doing other crazy stuff (Score 1) 114

Back in 2009, the same researchers had this hand doing all sorts of crazy dexterous motions... dribbling, pencil flipping, throwing & catching, etc: http://www.hizook.com/blog/2009/08/03/high-speed-robot-hand-demonstrates-dexterity-and-skillful-manipulation

Comment: Re:2 years for a PhD student... (Score 4, Informative) 22

by HizookRobotics (#43855003) Attached to: Willow Garage Makes Open Source Robots for Researchers (Video)

Actually, the fully-loaded cost for a PhD student is $75k-$80k / year (ie the amount charged to a faculty member's grant). You have to remember, PhD students' tuition is usually incurred as part of the cost since they're working in exchange for (1) a minimally-viable living stipend and (2) fully-paid tuition.

We had two PR2's in our lab (Georgia Tech's Healthcare Robotics Lab). There were ~2 people working on each at any given time.... so the $$ makes sense. And the PR2 was a great platform!

Source: my work on the PR2 http://www.hizook.com/blog/2010/10/16/pr2-robot-autonomously-delivers-medication-using-uhf-rfid-live-cnn

Comment: Ask 'em to put another load nearby (Score 3, Insightful) 215

by HizookRobotics (#41837397) Attached to: Wireless Power Over Distance: Just a Parlor Trick?
There are a lot of hard engineering problems to overcome, even if the system was efficient... For example, a second resonant load nearby severely de-tunes the system, antenna mounting considerations are of supreme importance (good luck putting one on a laptop full of metal), and antenna alignment is absolutely crucial! The whole WiTricity concept might be sound in theory, but the engineering challenges are monumental.

Comment: Biggest Robotics Hardware Announcement This Decade (Score 1) 342

by HizookRobotics (#41372143) Attached to: Hardware Is Dead — At Least Most Expensive Hardware Is
That's kind of a funny title to see this on the front page of /. on the same day that we have one of the biggest (robotics) hardware announcements of the decade: Rethink Robotics just announced their $22,000 humanoid robot. The visionary behind Rethink is Rod Brooks -- former MIT CSAIL director, co-founder of iRobot, etc etc. This new arm is a 10x drop in price compared to other comparable platforms (eg. Kuka, PR2, Barrett, Meka, ABB, etc). Hardware is definitely not dead... but perhaps "PC hardware" is...?

Comment: Inflatable Robots by Otherlab (Score 1) 88

by HizookRobotics (#41318377) Attached to: What's Next For iRobot?
IMO, the "big deal" in inflatable robots comes from OtherLab... They've built giant (ridable!) inflatable robots and inflatable robot arms with insane power to weight ratios. We did a special on them at Hizook a while back: http://www.hizook.com/blog/2011/11/21/inflatable-robots-otherlab-walking-robot-named-ant-roach-and-complete-arm-plus-hand The OtherLab project is also part of the same DARPA program (M3) that spawned the iRobot inflatable arm.

Comment: Re:Bipedal humanoid (Score 3, Insightful) 53

by HizookRobotics (#39594943) Attached to: Humanoid Robots For the Next DARPA Grand Challenge?
This is a common misconception. In academia, "humanoid" will usually refer to a robot with _some_ humanoid features (eg. two arms). If you look at the "Humanoids" conference, you'll see that there are a healthy mix of legged and wheeled designs. So I thought specificity was good in this case...

Comment: 3D already standard on DaVinci surgical system (Score 4, Interesting) 64

by HizookRobotics (#39569115) Attached to: UK Surgeons Are the First To Operate In 3D
Uhm... I'm pretty sure that every single one of the Intuitive Surgical DaVinci robot workstations are 3D for the operator -- and we all know that hundreds of surgeries are performed with these every day.. In this video of researchers playing "Operation" (the board game) with a DaVinci robot, you can see the operator console with separate eye pieces to give 3D effects. I personally got to play with a DaVinci at IROS (robotics conference) last year, and the operator console was definitely in 3D -- though the observer consoles are just normal 2D TVs. I was told that this had been standard for a _long_ time.

+ - Humanoid robots for the next DARPA Grand Challenge?->

Submitted by
HizookRobotics writes "The official announcement should be out very soon, but for now Hizook.com has unofficial, preliminary details based on notes from Dr. Gill Pratt's talk at DTRA Industry Day: The new Grand Challenge is for a humanoid robot (with a bias toward bipedal designs) that can be used in rough terrain and for industrial disasters. The robot will be required to maneuver into and drive an open-frame vehicle (eg. tractor), proceed to a building and dismount, ingress through a locked door using a key, traverse a 100 meter rubble-strewn hallway, climb a ladder, locate a leaking pipe and seal it by closing off a nearby valve, and then replace a faulty pump to resume normal operations — all semi-autonomously with just "supervisory teleoperation." That's a tough challenge, but it should be fun! It looks like there will be six hardware teams to develop new robots, and twelve software teams using a common platform (PETMAN anyone?!). The most crazy part about all of this: The United States is getting back into the humanoid robot game... in a big way!"
Link to Original Source

If it happens once, it's a bug. If it happens twice, it's a feature. If it happens more than twice, it's a design philosophy.