Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Mr Fixit (Score 1) 527

by Gunstick (#46764943) Attached to: How Does Heartbleed Alter the 'Open Source Is Safer' Discussion?

for years yes, but not for very long.
Especially professionals have a very long software cycle, still hanging around with redhat5 and other old stuff.
The bug was introduced in 1.01 and RH5 still runs 0.9.8
I have seen that a lot of times, bleeding edge may be cool, but not necessarily secure. Staying too far behind (into the non supported area) is not secure either.
So the "one release back" strategy is not bad. In this aspect debian stable is a bit too up to date.

Comment: Re:Old news (Score 1) 144

I checked. Running linux on the desktop since 16 years.
So yeah, no news for me.

There will be no linux on the desktop, because the desktop dissapears. But there is already linux on the smartphone, if you say it's unix on the smartphone, then there are even more... and add all tablets into the mix.

Comment: original question bad: astrology/horoscope (Score 1) 326

by Gunstick (#46273983) Attached to: NSF Report Flawed; Americans Do Not Believe Astrology Is Scientific

Had they asked if they believe in horoscope, the poll results would have been much better.

Funny poll:
* do you belive hroroscopes are scientific?
* do you believe astrology is scientific?

Rather an IQ test, to see who knows that astrology produces horoscopes.

Comment: demonstrating gravity by using gravity is, in itse (Score 1) 264

by Gunstick (#45885613) Attached to: Experiments Reveal That Deformed Rubber Sheet Is Not Like Spacetime

so you want to explain space curving by a mass. And to do so you put a mass into a rubber sheet which is curved by earth gravity. Oh, nice, so to replace the gravity in your experiment you use... gravity. Means the curvature of spacetime is shown by using spacetime effects on the model.
For me the thought experiment in itself is flawed. It's basically shifting dimensions, so our 3D becomes 2D and the spacetime becomes the 3rd dimension. Explaining what gravity is, it can't.

Comment: Re:Isn't it the default? (Score 1) 312

by Gunstick (#45536405) Attached to: Sex Offender Gets New Hearing After Hearing Officer Rants Against Arial Font

what is wrong?
lf you don't know that, you cIearIly never have checked if your URL has the right letters for i and L
Maybe use a pipe symbo| instead.
Ok, it quite obvious here, but anyway, who designs a font with a word which renders like this: Illogical
What about lIIl|I|llII|Il ?

Comment: I had 6 months long kernel root exploit on my mint (Score 1) 206

by Gunstick (#45461799) Attached to: Canonical Developer Warns About Banking With Linux Mint

That's why I mostly stay away from mint
Last year there was a linux root exploit in the kernel. I tried the exploit and it worked: bang root shell!
So I waited to see when this would be fixed via the usual upgrade path... nothing happened during 6 months.
Until I finally wanted to use my system and so I looked into the reasons why I'm still vulnerable while all other distributions are ok.
So I need to run apt-get to get a new kernel! That's not "ready for the desktop".

Come on! All distributions are so proud to always say that fixes get quickly spread and there comes mint saying: "I won't even notify the end user that he should upgrade his X or kernel because it is vulnerable". That's dumb. Mint is wrong, Ubuntu is right.
Result: I don't like Ubuntu, I don't like Mint. Is there a Mint derivative which does it correctly or do I need to go with Apple?

Comment: Re:So what did it do all that time? (Score 1) 409

by Gunstick (#43202039) Attached to: Solaris Machine Shut Down After 3737 Days of Uptime

I'm not sure what you mean by failover. For me failover is active-passive. So one node just sits there and starts the applicaiton when the other node fails.
If it's some sort of always-live where the data needs to be replicated realtime to all nodes, I confirm that the complexitiy is not worth the gain in uptime. Such constructions often experience more downtime because of the complexity, not because of the failures they should protect against.

Comment: My mac is only doing VNC to my linux box (Score 1) 965

by Gunstick (#43181103) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Mac To Linux Return Flow?

I never upgraded the powerbook as the next versions of the OS felt like being a regression.
I kept it only because some software is not available on linux. But wine may be a way out of that.
Currently another laptop made it's appearance. That one has windows and linux. But I only use linux and never had the need to boot into windows.
The smartphone I bought was not iOS but android.
So yes, the Apple adventure was nice but I did not get hooked.

Comment: fslint's findup deduplicator (Score 1) 440

by Gunstick (#41212033) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: How Do I De-Dupe a System With 4.2 Million Files?

Well yes, this is a linux tool, but still I was quite pleased with it's results for 800k files. It took some time but it had an end.
It's basically a shellscript doing what others have suggested: sort by size, same size files are checksummed. /usr/share/fslint/fslint/findup
find dUPlicate files.
Usage: findup [[[-t [-m|-d]] | [--summary]] [-r] [-f] paths(s) ...]
If no path(s) specified then the currrent directory is assumed.
When -m is specified any found duplicates will be merged (using hardlinks).
When -d is specified any found duplicates will be deleted (leaving just 1).
When -t is specfied, only report what -m or -d would do.

When --summary is specified change output format to include file sizes.
You can also pipe this summary format to /usr/share/fslint/fslint/fstool/dupwaste
to get a total of the wastage due to duplicates.

As it's a single command line with dozens of pipes, it should use all cores if needed.
some text from the source:

Description

      will show duplicate files in the specified directories
      (and their subdirectories), in the format:

              file1
              file2

              file3
              file4
              file5

      or if the --summary option is specified:

              2 * 2048 file1 file2
              3 * 1024 file3 file4 file5

      Where the number is the disk usage in bytes of each of the
      duplicate files on that line, and all duplicate files are
      shown on the same line.
              Output it ordered by largest disk usage first and
      then by the number of duplicate files.
Caveats/Notes:
      I compared this to any equivalent utils I could find (as of Nov 2000)
      and it's (by far) the fastest, has the most functionality (thanks to
      find) and has no (known) bugs. In my opinion fdupes is the next best but
      is slower (even though written in C), and has a bug where hard links
      in different directories are reported as duplicates sometimes.

      This script requires uniq > V2.0.21 (part of GNU textutils|coreutils)
      dir/file names containing \n are ignored
      undefined operation for dir/file names containing \1
      sparse files are not treated differently.
      Don't specify params to find that affect output etc. (e.g -printf etc.)
      zero length files are ignored.
      symbolic links are ignored.
      path1 & path2 can be files &/or directories

and the code has optimizations like this one
sort -k2,2n -k3,3n | #NB sort inodes so md5sum does less seeking all over disk

Quark! Quark! Beware the quantum duck!

Working...