Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: No. (Score 4, Informative) 201

by Grog6 (#40094517) Attached to: Little Health Risk Seen From Fukushima's Radioactivity

Nuclear tech saves many lives every day(Cancer treatment and detection), as well as powering the most likely long term energy solution.

The Japanese did not use graphite moderated reactors for very well known reasons, Chernobyl being the best example of those reasons... (Negative steam void reactivity coefficient, was a major one, iirc.)

The reactors at Chernobyl were pretty much updated versions of the ones we built during WWII to make plutonium, also iirc.

Idiocy=Bad.

Any tech is only as bad or good as what you use it for, and how you use it is your problem to explain.

Comment: The part that gets me... (Score 1) 142

I work with extremely sensitive radiation detectors at work; our typical energy is gamma at 511keV.

These gammas are derived from artificial radioactive sources, with a short half-life.

Testing these detectors is extremely informative; natural cosmic rays are much more worrisome to me than the sources...

I see 10-20GeV pulses at around 1-5 per minute; that's about all the energy they can dump in my detector, lol.

2x 8" lead bricks do not appreciably attenuate these cosmics at all; amazingly, underground missile silos were built to a spec! :)

Google

Google Steps In To Defend Hotfile From "Overbroad And Ill-Conceived" MPAA Lawsui->

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "Google has once again stood up in court for the rights of users and services online, this time defending Hotfile from copyright infringement accusations.

Google takes a sort of hard-line approach via the DMCA, telling the court that however the MPAA may try to mislead them, Hotfile is in fact protected under safe harbor provisions. And furthermore, Google suggests that the MPAA’s approach is contrary to the language in and precedents surrounding the DMCA. The onus is on copyright holders to alert a service to the nature and location of an infringement, and the service’s responsibility is to alert the user if possible and remove the material within a reasonable period of time.

"

Link to Original Source
Google

Google: Illegal phone number harvesting scam ->

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "Today I went online to access one of the email accounts I use for sensitive personal information and emails.

Instead of letting me log on, google refused me access unless I gave them my phone number "for verification purposes". Verify how? The account has no friends and no contacts connected. This is a plain phone number harvesting scam.

According the laws of my country, a database of phone numbers is illegal without special written governmental permission. Google violates this and breaks the law in a way that opens it up to serious lawsuits. In addition, to me it seems extremely unethical to force me to give them my phone number or refuse me access to my email.

Is kind of extortion legal in your country?"

Link to Original Source

If you don't like the way I drive, stay off the sidewalk!

Working...