Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Confirming details (Score 1) 18

by GrifterCC (#41755563) Attached to: Slashdot Anniversary: Washington, DC, US
Hey gang--sorry about the white-out. Props to eldavojohn for picking up the t-shirt slack. Grand Slam's a good venue, shouldn't be too bad around then unless I've overlooked some sporting event. It's actually inside the Grand Hyatt Washington. I'm 5'10", young looking, white with short brown hair, and will be wearing a suit. If you're worried about getting lost or anything, shoot me a PM and I'll send my cell number over.

Comment: Re:I got accused of rape once (Score 1) 1469

by GrifterCC (#41073419) Attached to: The Mathematics of 'Legitimate Rape' and Pregnancy
Please identify one feminist, anywhere on the Internet or in books, who claims that non-consensual pregnancy and subsequent child support cannot ruin a man's life.

Hell, identify one feminist who thinks that man in your hypothetical wasn't raped.

This ain't feminists disadvantaging men. It's the patriarchy harming everyone. Being "weaker"/female means you get raped more often. Being "stronger"/male means that when something painful and traumatic happens to you, nobody cares. See how everybody loses, and then you and I have to dispute whether this is a zero-sum game to begin with?

Anyway, your last question--most crimes, including rape, in most states, have an intent element. Most states also don't let you get wasted and say, "Hey, I was blind drunk, I didn't intend to rape zir!" They say, "You intended to get drunk. We charge you with the consequences." It's crude but effective, for example, in cases where a drunk driver kills a car full of teenagers.

I'm a lawyer but not your lawyer. Your state probably has weird rules and exceptions to this, just like every other state.

Comment: Clearly Established: a useful standard. (Score 5, Informative) 775

by GrifterCC (#37153138) Attached to: Teacher Cannot Be Sued For Denying Creationism
I am a lawyer, and about a third of my cases are representing state employees, and about a third of those involve cases with a "clearly established" defense, though I practice mostly in the Fourth Circuit, not the Ninth.

The "clearly established" standard is a way for courts to keep these kinds of suits from dinging innocent state employees. Basically, not only does the employee have to violate someone's right, but it has to have been pretty much unreasonable for the employee to think ze wasn't violating that right. Here, in fact, the panel didn't even hold that the kid had a right not to have this stuff said to him. So this case won't be precedent for future cases to reach back and say, "Well, as of the time the Corbett opinion was issued, the right not to have a teacher make fun of your religious beliefs was clearly established."

There are several other possible doctrines for protecting an employee in such a situation, and they're all salutary.

Comment: Re:Just say (Score 3, Informative) 525

by GrifterCC (#35875388) Attached to: Michigan Police Could Search Cell Phones During Traffic Stops
Even if you say nothing to the officer who stops you, you can be arrested for any driving infraction, even one that isn't a jailable offense, when you're in your vehicle.

Once you're arrested, you can be searched sans warrant. Once you're arrested, your car can be impounded, and your entire vehicle can be "inventory" searched.

Your car can also be searched sans warrant based on probable cause of any criminal activity, even if you aren't arrested.

Better hope the courts decide your phone is more like a footlocker or a trunk, but good luck with that. The Supreme Court, over the course of about a dozen major Fourth Amendment decisions, has taken a dim view of your right to privacy while in your automobile.


Comment: Lawyers Only? (Score 3, Informative) 218

by GrifterCC (#35646570) Attached to: Should Smartphones Be Allowed In Court?
I practice before the federal court in the Eastern District of Virginia at Alexandria, and they do not allow anyone, including lawyers, to bring their smartphones in. It's routine to have to look at your calendar on the fly when the judge wants to schedule something, so you have to have it with you. The EDVA policy is the main reason I still maintain a paper calendar parallel to my computer calendar.

I understand and buy into the rationale behind not letting jurors bring them in, but the state courts in the area almost universally allow lawyers to bring their smartphones in, and it's such a bonus.

Comment: Re:Neither reviewer liked it (Score 1) 429

by GrifterCC (#34685296) Attached to: <em>Tron: Legacy</em> &mdash; Too Much Imagination Required?
Subtext, symbolism, and metaphors are all creative work put in by one or more people. I have never understood the distinction between visual or musical symbolism (since you are satisfied by a trite movie with great visuals and awesome soundtrack) and the (thematic?) metaphors you are talking about. All are integral parts of the creative/artistic experience of watching a film.

Comment: Re:he's a douche, that's all that matters (Score 1) 334

by GrifterCC (#34559576) Attached to: Julian Assange's Online Dating Profile Leaked

Oh well, blame the feminists who never thought about the consequences of going to the police because of a condomless one night stand. You heartless bitches.

Is that what passes for "+5, Insightful" these days? Asking a woman who thinks she was raped not to come forward because of your politics is disgusting and terrifying. Your attitude exemplifies the reason that so many rapes go unreported. If she's not a liar or "regretting it the next morning," she's being politically insensitive.

Anyone who modded this Insightful should turn in their mod points or grow some humanity.


GPUs Helping To Lower CT Scan Radiation 77

Posted by kdawson
from the healthy-green-glow dept.
Gwmaw writes with news out of the University of California, San Diego, on the use of GPUs to process CT scan data. Faster processing of noisy data allows doctors to lower the total radiation dose needed for a scan. "A new approach to processing X-ray data could lower by a factor of ten or more the amount of radiation patients receive during cone beam CT scans... With only 20 to 40 total number of X-ray projections and 0.1 mAs per projection, the team achieved images clear enough for image-guided radiation therapy. The reconstruction time ranged from 77 to 130 seconds on an NVIDIA Tesla C1060 GPU card, depending on the number of projections — an estimated 100 times faster than similar iterative reconstruction approaches... Compared to the currently widely used scanning protocol of about 360 projections with 0.4 mAs per projection, [the researcher] says the new processing method resulted in 36 to 72 times less radiation exposure for patients."

Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no substitute for a good blaster at your side. - Han Solo