Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Hoarding, I guess. (Score 1) 309

by Gary Perkins (#39974357) Attached to: What do you usually do with old hardware?

I remember when my friend tried to install Linux on his 486, it wouldn't install in 4Megs but it would run in 4Megs. He had to borrow some of my memory from my Ramlink (C64/128 ram drive), I had 16 megs in it. My question is who thought it was a good idea to have the install specs higher than the running specs?

Was he installing using the GUI installer? Sure, it'll run XWindows with 4megs (it swaps a helluva lot), but when installing there's no virtual memory. Normally you'd run the text mode installer in such a limited environment. I'm fairly certain it installs with 4 megs.

Comment: Re:Just another corrupt judge (Score 1) 948

by Gary Perkins (#37964744) Attached to: No Charges For Child-Whipping Judge Caught On YouTube
Unfortunately, not every child responds to taking things away. I've set up a progressive discipline process whereby I first take away her outside playtime. Usually this results in her throwing stuff around the living room and knocking things off the table, so I'll tell her no TV/dessert/whatever, which usually results in some sort of bigger fit, and me sending her to her room (if she's going to break stuff, she can break her own stuff). I usually have to haul her there myself, and block the doorway, and also make sure she doesn't try to break the door. I try to verbally calm her down, which usually does not work, and pretty much the only option left is a spanking. It used to be even worse than this, to the point that I had to hold her down until she calmed down (she has Asperger's Disorder), but an adjustment to her medicine (she's 7 now, and bigger than she used to be) seems to have helped bring her back closer to reality again. There's not much to take away from her, as she's broken everything in her room. She has a bed, a desk, a chair, and her dresser, each one with pieces missing, scratched, torn, or broken apart.

Comment: Re:Just another corrupt judge (Score 2) 948

by Gary Perkins (#37962078) Attached to: No Charges For Child-Whipping Judge Caught On YouTube
There's a difference between a spanking and an all out beating. When I have to spank my kids, first thing I do is step back and think...do I really need to do this? Am I calm enough? Sometimes I'm too upset, and I do a quick breathing exercise, re-evaluate the situation, and realize a simple "Ok, lets sit down and talk about this" works. Other times, like out and out disobedience (multiple times (room...ROOM...ROOM NOW!!)) it's just necessary. Watching the video reminded me a lot of my daughter, but I was horrified by the father's actions. I read in my local news that this incident was over freakin' file sharing. Really, dad? He could've taken the computer away, problem solved and hopefully lesson learned. At 16 years old, if she wasn't going to woman up and take her licks, he could have found another way to discipline. My daughter is 7... I can pick her up and bend her over my knee...I do NOT use a belt, and I do NOT use my full force. I can only imagine what his daughter's legs looked like. It's far too easy to cause damage with a belt, and she's lucky she didn't walk away from that beating with more than bruises.
Cellphones

Congress may permit robot calls to cell phones.-> 2

Submitted by TCPALaw
TCPALaw writes "While many hoaxes have circulated in the past about cell phone numbers being opened up to telemarketers, it now may actually happen. A bill, HR 3035, has been introduced in Congress, that would create numerous exceptions to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, which banned autodialed and prerecorded robot calls to cell phone numbers. If passed, HR 3035 would permit a wide
range of autodialed and prerecorded calls to cell phones that are currently prohibited, and would preempt practically all state laws providing similar protections. This is being applauded by debt collectors and banks... as if the bailouts weren't enough, now they get to make you pay for their calls to you."

Link to Original Source
Science

Tevatron to be replaced With a Muon Collider->

Submitted by bs0d3
bs0d3 writes "Since the 1980s, the US government's Chicago-area Fermilab has been at the forefront of high-energy physics. Thanks to the Tevatron collider. The Tevatron collider is second highest energy particle collider in the world after the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). After it's completion in 1983 it became an important part in understading the world of quantum mechanics. Today fermilab is eyeing the world of muon colliders. A muon is a "lepton" which are elementary particles which have no sub-structure at all. Strange things start happening to time as the muons approach the speed of light. In the muons' frame of reference, time slows down relative to the frame of the accelerator hardware and the humans operating it. As a result of the speed, their short two microsecond lifetime begins to stretch out. Scientists could answer many questions that the LHC is not prepared for once they complete a muon collider."
Link to Original Source
Government

Journal: SSA hoops and misplaced info

Journal by Gary Perkins

There are two parts to this article.
Part 1 is the background and my beef with SSA and the process to get
Disability Benefits. Part 2 is the really interesting part. They
sent me ALL OF SOMEONE ELSE'S INFORMATION... everything that person
has submitted to them! Read on.

Part 1.

Comment: Re:why is science so mistrusted? (Score 1) 276

by Gary Perkins (#37429652) Attached to: Inspector General Investigated For Muzzling Inconvenient Science

but why do so many people feel that they're being misled by scientists? is it just that they don't want to believe what science says?

Yes and no. I think it also quite often has to do with people not really understanding the science. I know when something new that piques my interest comes around, I get quite confused very quickly once I get around to looking at the nitty gritty of it. At some point, the lay person simply has to place some faith in the scientists.

The problem is, every time a scientist is found to have abused the scientific method, plagiarized, or basically cheated or found plain wrong in some way, it discredits the entire profession in the lay persons' minds. Sure, this is why we rely on peer reviews, but there have been plenty of documented cases where bad science has gotten past that as well.

Conceit causes more conversation than wit. -- LaRouchefoucauld

Working...