Thanks...but looks like someone already took care of that for ya. I'm finally back into positive territory, after I had to give up my old account. My old account had my last name in it, and I received a veiled threat from someone who claimed they know me in real life in one of my journal entries, so I had make up a new account. Its hard to be in positive territory when your a conservative too.
Looks pretty small and not too dangerous. Hope they can find reasonable means to put it out.
I wonder how easily destructible the tower is with regards to attacks. I've heard it only sways 4.5" in the highest winds, which is remarkable for a 1000+ foot structure. I don't think it could be brought down by hitting it with a plane; maybe the only way is to melt it?
Well, with the WTC it wasn't the force, but the heat of the fire that brought it down. With the Eiffel tower, if it survived the impact, it would probably survive, because it doesn't have walls to contain the jet fuel to let a fire burn for a long time. I would think the jet fuel would just fall to the ground, unburned. I hope this never happens of course, as it is an amazing structure.
Also reported... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Also reported... (Score:2)
If I had mod points, I would mod you up, even though this is only in a journal.
And to stay on-topic, here [yahoo.com] is a picture.
Re:Also reported... (Score:1)
Re:Also reported... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Also reported... (Score:1)
With pictures... (Score:1)
Doesn't look too bad (Score:2)
I wonder how easily destructible the tower is with regards to attacks. I've heard it only sways 4.5" in the highest winds, which is remarkable for a 1000+ foot structure. I don't think it could be brought down by hitting it with a plane; maybe the only way is to melt it?
Re:Doesn't look too bad (Score:1)
Re:Doesn't look too bad (Score:1)
Re:Doesn't look too bad (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Doesn't look too bad (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Doesn't look too bad (Score:2)