Comment: Re:No surprise (Score 1) 334
Comment: Re:Bzzzzzt. (Score 1) 582
Comment: Re:*sigh* (Score 1) 254
(And since BioShock is such a recent game, exactly what has it had the chance to influence yet?)
Well, you could look at Fallout 3 - there's a fair bit of the style that looks astonishingly similar to Bioshock... just look at the "Please Stand By" TV display for example.
[Cocking a snook at the blatant neophilia of the list]
Comment: Re:Who got a 120Hz monitor today? (Score 1) 123
My ten year-old 21" CRT does at least 1024 x 768 @ 120 Hz. I think it drops down to 100HZ for 1280 x 1024 though, but I'd still be willing to give it a shot.
It's a pity that you can't buy decent CRTs any more, as I've yet to see a TFT that comes close to the performance of my current monitor. I'll be forced to change when it dies, but until then you can pry it out of my cold dead hands.
Comment: Re:Crippled like XP Home (Score 1) 842
"It took me nearly half an hour to realize that XP Home doesn't let you change permissions on files."
Really? I though you could get at NTFS permissions using (Explorer) Tools-> Folder options -> uncheck "Use simple file sharing".
If not, you still have CACLS if you're prepared to get your fingers dirty.
Comment: Sounds like an interesting idea (Score 3, Insightful) 420
As well as that, how about setting the default admin account so you have no sounds, no desktop wallpaper, no animated cursors - none of the flashy crap that users seem intent on encumbering themselves with. You want the bling == run as a limited user.
However this would require limiting the capabilities of the Admin account, and this is something I'm not entirely happy with (as, admin *should* be equivalent to god mode).
Comment: Agreed (Score 1) 388
I've been installing Foxit on new machines for about nine months now, and have a lot of love for it. It was the retarded reboot-on-upgrade policy of Adobe that particularly ticked me off (load times notwithstanding).
I noticed earlier today that V3 is out, will be giving this a trial run sometime over the next couple of weeks. Only thing I'm hoping for is that they've improved the process for unattended setups, as this is the only thing that bugs me at the moment.
Comment: Re:Whoa... (Score 1) 504
You'd *better* believe The Man.
An oldie but a goodie.
Comment: I'd respectfully disagree (Score 1) 835
unless the submitter has two identical machines. Reason being, if the hard disc is swapped into another system there's a fair chance the wrong chipset driver will be provided and the compisite machine will bluescreen.
Even worse would be if the machine starts correctly and then installs its own chipset driver causing bluescreens when the hard disc is swapped back.
My first port of call, before the memory diagnostic and before running SMART tests would be the event log. It's neglected far too much for my liking.
I'd follow that with perfmon, and then offline AV scanners / liveCDs. Then I'd start thinking about burn-in testing and swapping out hardware.