I'd like to have a camera installed in all rooms of your house. It's just a nudge to discourage you from making irresponsible decisions like child or spousal abuse. After all, what's the harm? It's for your own good.

That if you're out shopping for bomb material there's a possibility, perhaps even a probability, that you're buying from the FBI. That will give all but the more dedicated whackos a moment's pause because they recognize the risk of being caught is too much to ignore.

Much in the same way that slavery 'frees' the slave of the need to worry about making any decisions on their own at all.

And unless you ensure that you dont have like breeds/strains/etc being grown/raised contigiously AT A COUNTY OR STATE LEVEL you cannot assist in that containment. You have to have a calculated and agreed upon mechanism whereby every farmer in very large reqions ensure that they arent raising/growing any breed that their neighbors are so that a spread of disease has no vehicle to pass over large areas.

I farm and raise horses. I do have a little bit of a clue about it. I cant get my neighbors to agree on whose turn it is to level the farm roads, let alone agree on what crops we're each going to raise.

No more so than in wildlife. Nature changes. The alternative to that is far less appealing.

I'd say that not be wholly reliant on one thing would increase your overall odds. Wouldnt you?

Arguments against monocropping are pointless unless you're dealing with geographic regions. Changing my farm from corn to soybeans doesn't mean jack if the guy next to me is rotating corn and soybeans as well, and the same is true of his neighbors and so on.

Unless you're able to coordinate and schedule the growing/raising at a county or state level you arent going to have impact on mutation or spread of disease. You may actually cause more harm than good by forcing ecosystems in a large area to adapt rapidly, raising the possibility of severe unintended consequences.

For contagions: No. They do not evolve in livestock to directly attack humans any more so than they do from plants. They evolve in their host and can be transmissible, and this is just as true from plants as it is from livestock.

For the non-transmissible diseases/insects : You wont give a shit about the direct danger posed by them if they indirectly cause your starvation.

WTF does it have to do with global warming?

Luckily there's never any human illness or casualties from contagion on crops, nor strains of fungus, mold, or insects that desimate farmlands...