Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:Cheers for Egyptians Everywhere! (Score 0) 137

by Facebeast (#35080506) Attached to: Egypt Coming Back On the 'net

Fondled != frisked.

Don't be facetious. You know damn well he was pointing out an example the massive invasion of privacy that follows from the removal of personal freedoms. This is just one example of governments treating us like criminals (CCTV, keeping fingerprint and DNA data of people question but not charged by police, US government monitoring our internet traffic) without justification. We aren't even guilty until proven innocent any more; we have to keep on proving ourselves innocent over and over again.

(Also, you forgot a "think of the children". Every rant like yours needs a "think of the children" to be truly effective.)

I think you got this somewhat the wrong way round. It's the "think of the children" line that is wheeled out to justify sacrificing liberty time and time again, not defending it.

Comment: Re:So why the Pre-Christmas Spike? (Score 0) 474

by Facebeast (#34126284) Attached to: Facebook Knows When You'll Get Dumped
I remember reading about this just before last Christmas in the Metro (free commuter paper here in the UK). Apparently a lot of people in not particularly serious relationship break up in time to have some fun in the Christmas party season. It's kinda sad in my opinion that a statistically significant number of people are unhappy enough in their relationships to ditched them in favour of the chance of a drunken quickie in the stationary cupboard at the office party.

Comment: Re:look another US-American idiot! (Score 0) 267

by Facebeast (#33451988) Attached to: <em>Lineage II</em> Addiction Lawsuit Makes It Past the EULA

Want to be an atheist? That's perfectly acceptable. It's as acceptable and reasonable as someone choosing to be religious. But there's no need to revise history and make unfounded claims in order to convince yourself that you're in the right and somehow enlightened.

Bollocks. The burden of proof is to prove that god exists. As a "rational agnostic" there is not an equal likelyhood of God existing or not existing. That simply isn't true, since there is no evidence whatsoever to support the existence of God, every day that passes the probability of him existing fades to zero. And even worse he is no more likely to exist than any other crackpot ideas you can think of (Thetans, anyone?).

I agree that it is rational to be agnostic over atheistic, denying the possibility of something we cannot definitely prove is as irrational as believing it is definately true. But when the probability of god is so low that he is no more or less likely to exist than the flying spaghetti monster, the invisible intangible silent unicorn, or Russell's teapot, "rational agnosticism" tends towards very-nearly-atheism to such a point that it becomes a mere semantic difference.

I would imagine that the majority of racists are not the smug closed minded "just a faith in no god" morons you suggest, but very well informed "99.9%-no-agnostic-but-I-call-myself-atheist-it's-easier".

Consider this difference:

If someone proved categorically there was a God tomorrow, the majority of atheists would be eating humble pie and choosing a religion to join.

If someone proved the opposite beyond all doubt, ie. that no god can possibly exist, the vast majority of religious people would reject the evidence and carry on as if nothing happened.

As for the original point, I think it was Bertrand Russell who once said something relevant:

"A good man will do good deeds, whilst an evil man will do evil deeds. But for a good man to do evil deeds requires religion"

Comment: Re:look another US-American idiot! (Score 5, Insightful) 267

by Facebeast (#33446786) Attached to: <em>Lineage II</em> Addiction Lawsuit Makes It Past the EULA

More good comes from modern religion than you can imagine.

War. Racism. Homophobia. Sexism. Indoctrination of children. Rejection of science/reason. Rejection of contraception leading to the spread of STDs.

So what's the good bit? It better be fucking massive.

Comment: Re:The media disagrees (Score 0) 329

by Facebeast (#33029870) Attached to: The End of Forgetting

Beyond that drugs don't have a constructive use in society. At best they're benign and at worst they cause a lot of damage to people not directly involved.

You could make same argument about sport, TV, video games, playing D&D or just about any primarily recreational activity when done to excess. Having a couple of spliffs or taking a pill or two at a club occasionally has been consistently proven not to be any more harmful in the long or short term than drinking alcohol.

Comment: Re:Actually, here science and the Bible agree. (Score 0, Flamebait) 341

by Facebeast (#32910826) Attached to: The Chicken May Have Come Before the Egg

Once again, the Bible was right.

No it wasn't. It got three events in roughly the right historical order (although actually most modern animals evolved a long time after all three had been created), if you look at it a certain way. In a book over a thousand pages long that is not impressive at all. Now I would be impressed by the biblical creation stories if god has spent the previous three weeks creating strange single celled creatures and burying fake skeletons to trick us into believing evolution. I still wouldn't believe it though.

Personally, I don't find this "evidence" to be particularly compeling, but then I'm no longer the blind faith in science type. Science will never prove anything conclusively because it's a game where they continually move the goal posts.

How can you have blind faith in science? The point of science is that it can be proven wrong and therefore does not require any faith. Wanting definite answers is something I can certainly sympathise with but choosing the Bible over science is not choosing the definite over the uncertain. It is choosing something which has already been proven wrong over something which has not been proven wrong yet.

Comment: Re:The funny part is, it's still better than Andro (Score 1) 417

by Facebeast (#32745646) Attached to: Apple Hires Antenna Engineers. Really.

The biggest problem with any Android phone is the terrible software it's saddled with. Some of the HTC devices look pretty nice, spec wise, but the OS on them is utter shit. And, no, openness doesn't make up for being shit.

Neither is prettiness but Apple seems to get away with it.

Comment: Re:We're still a big powerful country! (Score 1) 125

by Facebeast (#31595570) Attached to: UK Space Agency Launched

when the country is running through one of the most serious economic crises of its existence.

Technological investment seems like a pretty good way to encourage long term economic growth and stability to me. It sure beats paying people to do fuck all, like the rest of our unelected socialist dictator's retarded policies.

If it's working, the diagnostics say it's fine. If it's not working, the diagnostics say it's fine. - A proposed addition to rules for realtime programming