Comment: Re:now account for the sinks (Score 1) 461
Good points, but US forests were likely growing for much of the past few centuries, because they were not in equilibrium.
I still don't get what you're trying to say. Your own figures show that the US forest coverage has declined by 2,000,000 Km2 since pre-industrial times. So the forest has been a net carbon source, not a sink.
These days, forests in the US are used extensively for making paper and wood (as opposed to heating), which does result in carbon capture.
No. Most of that paper and wood is either burned after use or goes into landfill, where bacterial decay turns it into methane, then eventualy to CO2.
The only way for a forest to be a sink is for it to grow (which is of course impossible in the long term), or for the wood to be cut and sequestered somewhere outside the carbon cycle, which is something we have never managed to do.