Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Games

Are Porn and Games Basically the Same Thing?->

Submitted by silentbrad
silentbrad writes "IGN published an article, today, discussing an editorial from CNN: Pornography and videogames are pretty much the same thing, according to a sensational and terrifying editorial published on CNN today called ‘The Demise of Guys: How Videogames and Porn are Ruining a Generation’. Games and porn are not only equal, they are equally damaging to young men, destroying their ability to connect with women, and therefore threatening the future of our entire species. ... The article, by psychologist Philip G. Zimbardo and Nikita Duncan argues that young men are “hooked on arousal, sacrificing their schoolwork and relationships in the pursuit of getting a tech-based buzz”. ... Zimbardo, has danced this jig before. At the Long Beach TED conference last year he told a delighted audience that “guys are wiping out socially with girls and sexually with women.” He added that young men have been so zombiefied by games and porn that they are unable to function in basic human interactions. “It’s a social awkwardness like a stranger in a foreign land”, he said. “They don’t know what to say. They don’t know what to do.”"
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Really? (Score 4, Informative) 263

by DinDaddy (#40111769) Attached to: Higher Hard Drive Prices Are the New Normal

When there are only two or three competitors in a market, actual collusion is no longer necessary. They simply have an unwritten and unspoken agreement to keep prices where they are

Ummm ... isn't that what collusion means

No, to collude, they would need to communicate in some form, written or spoken. Just guessing that the other party thinks like you and acting on that assumption is NOT collusion.

Comment: Re:Don't blame Amazon (Score 1) 295

by DinDaddy (#40065565) Attached to: Amazon Poised To Get Cut of CA Sales Taxes

It's sort of a difficult question. Amazon is going to build the fulfillment centers in the location most advantageous to it. In the absence of these type negotiations, that location would be predicated on centrality of the area it will serve, available employee base, utility costs, (unaltered) tax rates, etc. There would be some small number of locations on the list with more or less equal advantages from which they would have to choose.

The cities offering these tax refunds are either not on that list, or not willing to chance not being the winner. If it is not in their interests, why would they try and do this? A few reasons I can conceive: Corruption (some kickbacks or development deals in play), PR useful for re-election, etc.

Given the way politics is played, which seems to be virtually never for the interests of the public, something along the lines of the latter two seem far more likely to me.

Comment: Re:It really isn't sugar, that is just one avenue (Score 1) 654

by DinDaddy (#40021085) Attached to: The Mathematics of Obesity

Have to echo that. Curious if the study looked at different levels of exercise.

  I am fast approaching 50, and in my mid 40s had pit one probably 15-20 pounds, depending on which year you look at. I scaled back my food intake from probably 3000 calories a day to 2000, but didn't really change my amount of exercise, which was low to medium, including activity at work. Probably dropped 4-6 pounds.

About 10 months ago, started doing actually strenuous workouts, although only 2-3 times a week on average, about 60-90 minutes each, and actually began eating more again, probably back up to 2500 or more, and I am down below the 20 pound loss mark, back to what I weighed in my late 20s. My metabolism is significantly higher.

I don't think moderate exercise like walking or light aerobics or things like that have the same effect.

Possessions increase to fill the space available for their storage. -- Ryan

Working...