|
|
We had "SMS" fifteen years ago with bidirectional alphanumeric pagers and TAP.
The SMS specification was completed in 1990 and the first commercial implementation came out in 1993 which is 5 years before your "fifteen years ago".
If you're BAC was 1.5 or 1.3 you'd be dead.
Hate to break it to you but you're wrong.
March 2013 figures:
StatCounter: Chrome: 38%. Firefox: 20.9%. Safari: 8.5%.
Wikimedia: Chrome: 44.0%. Firefox: 18.2%. Safari: 3.2%.
W3Counter: Chrome: 30.3%. Firefox 19.3%. Safari: 16.3%.
NetApplications: Chrome: 16.5%. Firefox: 20.2%. Safari: 5.3%.
Clicky: Chrome: 35.8%. Firefox: 21.3%. Safari: 9.5%
From the Wikipedia page on browser usage share. April stats doesn't have Wikimedia or NetApplcations but the figures still don't back you up for what is there.
No it doesn't. The First sale doctrine is a limit on the rights the owner of a copyright or trademark not patents.
Or he was making a joke...
Nah, that couldn't have been it.
I seriously doubt they do.
Perhaps users are heeding Stallman's warning on Chromebooks.
You're joking, right? Please tell me this wasn't actually a serious statement...
It means the submitter and Unknown Lamer fail at arithmetic.
Marvel's stories deal with darker, more complex, and more adult issues. These are issues that Disney is not accustomed to working with.
Miramax was part of Disney for 17 years. You have heard of them, right?
January 2013 was last year? Are you posting from the future?
There sure are a lot of people on this forum defending the "senior guy" and his poor work habits.
And you know for certain the senior guy actually has lazy habits, how, exactly? All we have is a post claiming this and nothing more.
No that's not what I said. I said "don't download it". If you don't bu, but then subsequently pirate it they will always be able to use piracy as a scapegoat.
Well, yes, that's because they can point to the 10,000+ active peers on a torrent for their good. You whine abouy DRM then pirate it then wonder why they blame piracy. It's the perfect scapegoat. If the people against DRM would stop downloading the goods they'd have no way to blame piracy.
Yes, Intel sells CPUs with GPUs integrated. That doesn't change the fact that their core business is selling CPUs not GPUs. Or please link to where I can buy a discrete GPU from Intel. Nvidia's core business, on the other hand, is their GPUs.
Intel has no problem because their business isn't selling GPUs.
There is something in the pang of change More than the heart can bear, Unhappiness remembering happiness. -- Euripides
