Comment: I disagree with you (Score 1) 336
This is just amazing to me. They are literally saying that educating people about global warming will increase their skepticism, and therefore actually transmitting sound scientific information would be bad.
That's not how I read what they're saying. They aren't saying "bad". They're saying "if you give them ONLY the facts, it won't help." You then strawman that into "they want to stop giving us the facts and just give us propaganda".
Persuasive writing is all about knowing your audience. If throwing pure facts at your audience bores them, you need more than just facts. This means "in addition to facts", not "in replace of facts".