Slashdot stories can be listened to in audio form via an RSS feed, as read by our own robotic overlord.


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:What else do you expect? (Score 1) 706

by Dasuraga (#44849619) Attached to: Student Arrested For Using Phone App To 'Shoot' Classmates
He said value over, because people do seem to care a lot more about the second than the first. There are tradeoffs for everything, and just because you value one right over the other doesn't mean you reject one. Even if legally, they're both on the same level, they have different values when it comes to the social perception of things. And that it was matters in the long-term, as that is what defines how much rights/whatever tradeoff we're willing to make concerning those rights. We seem much more willing to let go of the rights of the first than the second.

Comment: Re:Slippery slope. (Score 1) 604

by Dasuraga (#43506769) Attached to: Bruce Schneier On the Marathon Bomber Manhunt
Again you forget to mention the fact that he maimed dozens of people as well. If the guy had not actually killed anyone, and the "150 injured" number were the only one floating around, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

A guy blowing off a bunch of people's legs is not a "weekend" in a many cities.

Comment: Re:Not true. (Score 1, Troll) 984

by Dasuraga (#43137039) Attached to: Ohio Judge Rules Speed Cameras Are a Scam

You're not really wrong here, but there's something awful about being watched all the time and being busted for every minor and often harmless infraction.

I understand the sentiment but speeding is not an "often harmless" infraction. It endagers yourself and those around you. (Semantics about whether the speed limits are set at the right level or not are here as well, but still).

Comment: Re:Science (Score 3, Interesting) 116

by Dasuraga (#43112853) Attached to: Spaceport Development Picks Up Steam In Texas
I get that it's a joke, but I'm really tired of hearing people demean Texas' education system.
While the state might not do so well in math and science test comparisons compared to other states, the state excels at making many things available to students that are rare if non-existent elsewhere. The right to a good education is in the state constitution (which also asks for the foundation of "first-class" state universities: University of Texas and Texas A&M), and implements a very broad wealth redistribution scheme (Robin hood plan), which makes sure that even very poor school districts can pay for AP classes, music electives, sports facilities, the works. Children who show potential are given chances from a very early age to enter advanced-placement courses, and many efforts are made by teachers to identify children who can enter these.

I honestly think that the low rankings of Texas in Math and Science comparisons is more due to demographics than the school system, and in more general rankings the school fares much better. In any case, it goes to great lengths to let children broaden their horizons with their peers, independent of social class.

Comment: Re:No (Score 1) 522

by Dasuraga (#43087853) Attached to: Can Valve's 'Bossless' Company Model Work Elsewhere?
that isn't the primary incentive for everyone. Ask all your starving artists, hobbyist programmers who somehow landed a job doing what they love, teachers, the list goes on. Money is important for people mainly to be able to live comfortably. Its primary in the same way food is important. The possitive correlation between satisfaction and salary stops after one point.

Comment: Re:What?! (Score 5, Insightful) 642

by Dasuraga (#42928203) Attached to: The US Redrawn As 50 Equally Populated States
The purpose of the electoral college was to avoid having the most important office in the federal gov't be victim to popular fervor. In a direct election, radicals can be too easily elected (see tea party). This system prevents that in theory (along with the voting system of the electors: in seperate areas. This prevented one guy from giving a moving speech and changing the minds of everyone.)

Disclaimer: "These opinions are my own, though for a small fee they be yours too." -- Dave Haynie