Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Great! (Score 2) 247

by DarkXale (#43801753) Attached to: Intel's Linux OpenGL Driver Faster Than Apple's OS X Driver
Steam titles still run natively, all steam does is provide an additional overlay - which a lot of other software (voice-com especially) also does. Performance difference is essentially ignorable when theres nothing to show, it won't have anything to show unless you explicitly trigger the correct hotkey - or on special events like LOW BATTERY or MESSAGE RECEIVED.

Comment: Re:BS Summary (Score 1) 173

by DarkXale (#43564585) Attached to: Recovering Data From Broken Hard Drives and SSDs (Video)
It still undergoes a P/E cycle however. The erase process is very time consuming, and SSD performance is severely impacted if it has to do those on the fly. SE on drives with Encryption still has the role to reset the drive so that it performs at peak capacity afterwards, which means draining all the cells. Skipping the P/E cycle would mean that drive performance would be severely reduced.

Comment: Re:Direct X vs Open GL (Score 1) 496

by DarkXale (#40861047) Attached to: Is It Time For an OpenGL Gaming Revolution?
Mac OS lacks a bit in the OpenGL implementation though. Windows gains 4.2 support through drivers, but Mac OS cannot in any way run anything but 3.x (assuming you have lion, else its 2.x). This of course also ignoring the drastic optimization advantage Windows has. Ever taken a look at driver release notes? Half the time, you get a long list of "Game improved by 25% (AMD + Skyrim, 12.7 beta), game improved by 7%, game improved by 14%, game improved by 9%, game improved by 40% (COD: Black Ops in an older AMD driver)" - on and on and on... and the same game sometimes appears multiple times. This optimization competition between AMD and NVIDIA just outright does not exist on Mac OS. At all.

Comment: Re:No sympathy (Score 1) 646

by DarkXale (#39655573) Attached to: End of Windows XP Support Era Signals Beginning of Security Nightmare
MS are still perfectly entitles to ship updates, yes. And they might continue to do so for issues not exclusive to XP. But whether they do, well thats anyones guess. But what Microsoft ultimately does end up doing will be quite telling; and could be important when choosing an OS for 'today' that itself needs to be around for 10+ years. (As you'll certainly be facing this issue again by then)

I would rather say that a desire to drive fast sports cars is what sets man apart from the animals.

Working...