Comment: Audi 2008 (Score 1) 299
Comment: Re:Already implemented here (Score 1) 299
Yeah, we have the same as well. With a minor upgrade recently that checks your speed and if you driving over speed limit it puts there red light right in front of you. Great for ecology, traffic fluence, safety... you name it!
Mind you, speed limit is enforced with no tolerance so even at 3AM driving 2 km/h over limit assures red light. Is rather bullying us then helping.
Comment: Re:Joking about this is the height of stupidity. (Score 1) 709
... the other tweet in question was a Family Guy quote
Ah, copyright infringement. No wonder they were kicked out.
You made me laugh loudly here, thx!
Comment: Re:Advice (Score 1) 197
Comment: Re:Eric Schmidt, master of non-answers (Score 1) 431
It's probably not the developers' fault, I think there is universal agreement that Android is much harder to develop for.
Citation needed. Really!
Comment: This is sick (Score 1) 434
Comment: Geography (Score 5, Funny) 129
Comment: Re:The one touch camera is going to be abused ... (Score 1) 246
Yes but this is different matter here. One of the best Android out-of-the-box features is that you can lock it so that noone else can use that unless s/he knows your PIN/gesture/passwd/whatever. When the phone is locked, not even HW camera button works - and rightly so IMHO. Having soft camera button on the unlock screen kills it.
Furthermore I wonder if the camera launched by this soft button will still have that icon to get you to Gallery and browse all pictures taken in past
Comment: Re:patent avoidance? (Score 1) 112
Another company that did that (motorola?) paid MS $5 per phone.
HTC