Digitize it, put it on an encrypted usb stick you have always with you.. on that sites are lists of what all to include.
Some pinball machines also have bugs in their software...
And pinball for me it is also, that's why I have them at home
they're fun because the ball is wild
videogames are predictable, pinball machines always have some random element no matter how skillful you are
You get trained to be fast and use power, but indeed in inefficient spots like parent says.
I do tkd myself, we get a combination of tkd and streetfighting.
The tkd part is real sports - learn all the basic movements,be fast and score points - any contact counts as a point.
In the streetfighting part we get hapkido on top of tkd, we train our reflexes, how to block and counter an attacker (barehanded, using knives, sticks,
Our master usually explains how we have to do a movement for training, but also where to aim when it's really needed..
Like at training we punch into someones stomach, when attacked you don't aim for the middle of the stomach but higher to take away his breath, on the side into his ribs, or lower into his balls..
I saw these (or a similar type) last year here in Belgium when I was part of a test panel/opinion group.
Basically it was all possible types of payment systems thrown together in one card.
It had the debit card system we have here (Maestro / Bancontact), but at the same time you could use it as a credit card too (Visa / Mastercard). Most people in the group found this a good idea as all had multiple cards in their wallet.
As you can see it has the keypad type thing for extra authentication on the internet so you don't need an extra device for it. Nice, but less useful. Not everyone had a need for it, and we didn't get technical details about how secure it was or how it worked.
It also had some kind of contact-less system we don't have yet in Belgium but they said it was used in France. Small payments you could just make by holding your card above a reader, no need to enter a pin. As we don't know this, most found it insecure.
It also wasn't known if you could deactivate certain things or always had all features - like only use the debit/credit card combination but not the touchless thing.
I remember one disadvantage: the 'buttons' you had to push to generate the nr were difficult to operate. Had to push hard in exactly the right spot. Don't think elderly people could get along with it.
Technically I was impressed with this card for having battery electronics and lcd in it, as it was very thin and still flexible.
Well in that case when technology can detect a problem, it could also warn about it. Entering a room with the wrong protective gear ? Have the door tell you or even block you out. That would be even better than fining you automatically afterwards.
Scotts ideas are mostly just brainstorming what-ifs which just do not work in reality. They're thought-provoking, but sometimes imo he thinks of the wrong solutions/consequences.
A recent example he had was about selfdriving cars, flexible speed limits and tickets.
Flexible speedlimits for selfdriving cars, I'm all for it. We all want to get as fast as possible somewhere, and if the computers/cars decide they can drive safe at 150mph on a specific road, then do it.
But his other idea: your car knows where you are, the speedlimit on the road, and you get a ticket when you speed.
Imo not a good idea. People speed now because they hope they don't get caught. Always getting a ticket would not be fun and will probably cause people not to drive too fast anymore.
But imo the only correct solution would be to limit the speed your car can do and not allow speeding at all.
Laws should be the same for everyone. His solution would bend the law: if you can't afford a ticket you can't speed, if you have money you can without other consequences. Once you start allowing this, it's easy to allow other things automatically. The division between groups of people, between rich/poor,
I follow his blog for a long time now.. his idea of an ideal society is a bit similar to what's been pictured in the Demolition Man movie.
A pieceful world without crime, partly because everyone is being tracked (without this being used against someone).
You don't want people to be tracked. His opinion is the total opposite: track everyone everywhere (but don't misuse that information).
If a crime happened, someone (police, government, a computer,
And yes this is only one of his ideas, it would only work in an ideal work where there would be no way at all to circumvent this tracking.
Last year in Belgium a large storm hit Pukkelpop festival (large tents collapsed, some people died). Phone lines were all overloaded (both outgoing and incoming phones) but people could still tweet/fb they were ok.
they probably read in the stars they weren't going to win
> Even if your boss is a jerk, you still have control of your own life.
That's the whole point - people with a strong external locus will think they do not have control of their own life, and whatever they do or happens to them is 'karma' or 'destiny' and they can't change it, no matter what they do. They expect the next job they'll have will be again for another jerk boss (and because they act with that attitude it may very well become a self fulfilling prophecy).
And all of this is also influenced by a lot of factors, like religion, language,
Most people don't think about it and take what we know/how we think now for granted, without realizing a lot of factors are involved.
I recently read a book about the history of statistics, and how religion/language/writing was also a factor.
Romans and Greeks were very intelligent people, used a lot of advanced math and calculations, and (iirc) never got the notion of chance.
One of the reasons was that their way of writing numbers (fractions) wasn't optimal for it (having 1 in 10 or 2/13 chance of an event is easier to read/calculate with than I/V or II/XIII).
Religion was also important - they just believed everything happened for a reason, because one of their gods decided it,
So yes I believe the original study will have some merit - although we now live in a global world where everything is connected (and we speak/know of many languages), culture of certain countries is still passed trough many generations.
If your language does not allow you to talk well about present/future, it will in some way shape how you think and how you act.
Continued - but still Rovios point is correct, it's better to treat (potential) customers as fans and try to win them for you so they'll eventually buy your product, than act like the music industry and be arrogant and sue everyone, as this will only cause your customers to abandon you even more..
And their business model isn't a perfect analogy with the music industry, so their comparison doesn't hold true.
Btw I know I'm playing devils advocate here.
But the music industry are in fact middlemen between consumers and the artists themselves, and their product (revenue) comes from the music itself (songs, on cd, downloaded,
Rovio can be compared to the artists (who also sell themselves). Their main product are downloads of their games. Anything else that is copied (tshirts, posters, toy dolls,
And those producers that pay for a license to make related products, are seen as additional income streams, but licensing the Angry Birds brand is not their core business.
If enough illegal dowloads of their full games become available, or other people will make clones of their games (think angry owls/bad birds/..) and this causes a significant drop in sales of their own games, they'll also have to react (by legal means) to survive as a company, as their main income stream is treatened.
If you want to compare to the music industry, then compare them to artists. Most (small) bands don't earn a lot from cd sales, getting known is better for them, even if it's by illegal downloads, as this will mean they'll become more popular, do more and bigger concerts, sells related things (posters, tshirts,
Also my opinion.. probably a discussion will end being around technicalities (legal catching radiowaves or not)..
Marketing/branding research already investigated shop layouts and paths shoppers make since many years. This is nothing new.
The only difference is that in the past it was small scale. It started somewhere in the 1960ies/70ies, you had actual people in a shop and observing how shoppers walked around (seems most enter a shop, turn to the right and go around in a big circle).
Later security cameras were used to do this, just record everything and have someone watch the tapes later and draw out the path.
Probably now some automatic computer tracking is added to it, so you don't need a person watching all the tapes and tracking individual paths..
Only big difference now with cellphones is that it's done on a much larger scale, they can track everyone around the shopping centre and even know when people come back..
If you're interested in this, read the book Buyology by Martin Lindstrom. HE did tests how effective marketing/commercials/.. are for decision making using brain scans/eeg/...
Seems most decisions are made instant by our unconscious, and only (milliseconds) later our conscious mind tries to 'explain' why we made a specific decision.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Another interesting book is Buyology by Martin Lindstrom.
He's in advertising and researched the influence of ads whilst taking brainscans of people..
Very interesting book. Seems most of the time our decision to buy/not buy/do/.. and all our actions are made almost intantly, but only later our conscious has to 'explain' it to ourselves..