I was LOL'ing at the ginger part namely because I was thinking of South Park and how all gingers are evil lol...but on a side note, I am a parent and I do not agree with the PTC or anything that trys to dictate how I raise my kids. Personally I think there is nothing wrong with a show called Shit My Dad though I was one that thought it was Fuck My Dad. This is all and all just wrong and more people just trying to say what they think is right and if you disagree well thats just too bad.

But, I was thinking, is it not possible that maybe someone from MYTH actually works at R* now??? Maybe not but still everyone is claiming hypocrisy and the like but why complain. They removed the DRM so that the software could be distributed via STEAM for people to play. If nothing else, they did people a service. I don't know but it just seams that this is a good thing as it proves to companies that DRM gets in the way of them making money and if those who are gonna get it some other way are going to do it regardless of DRM maybe the companies are finally learning. I know all this is doubtful but honestly I do feel like companies are starting to learn that the people who pay for games will always pay regardless and no matter what protection you put on a game, pirates are always going to crack it and distribute it for free.

The black Wii has only been on sale for maybe a month or two in the US. I don't know why but it's true. They released it as a bundle package for one of their new games here.

Valid point, but it comes back to where does it end, and why is this being allowed to happen? Why did no one in the school stand up and say this is wrong? Covering their ass would have been someone saying this is a mistake lets not do this, now they are just being petty and saying well its a reg that you can not have candy.

But as of right now they are getting away with it, sure it can be challenged but if it is honestly a law, which I can be certain of but if it is, then where does it end?

This has to be the most obsurd story I have ever seen. Honestly to say that we are banning all minimal nutrition foods, is rediculous. Why is it this country has started to give the Gov't so much power that now they decide what we are and aren't allowed to eat, and where we are going to eat it at? I know I love candy and hell in my old h/s the band kids sold some phenomenal chocolate chip cookies. We even had a snack line that you could get candy. What are the fundraisers now gonna be well were not gonna sell cookies or chocolate, we selling vegetables from now on and maybe some fruit. Seriously this is just rediculous. I don't blame the kid or the parents or even the kid that gave the candy to the girl. I would just skip detention and let them suspend my kid for however many days they want. This is just ludicrous. Hell even my kid whos 2 gets to eat chocolate and such every now and again. Its not like he gets it every day but really to have the gov't or the school or whomever step in and say its illegal is WRONG!

OK, so I am probably one of the few that doesn't play an FPS for the solo missions, as I strictly play MW and MW2 for the online multiplayer deathmatch scenarios, its just my flavor. The only 2 games I have actually completed as of late are Dragonage: Origins and FF XIII, Dragonage was a bit long but I created several different characters until I found the moveset and story line that I liked. FFXIII was fun in that it was linear and honestly doesn't take to incredibly long to beat. The only gripe I have for FFXIII is the leveling system. You can't even max out your characters until AFTER you beat the game. Now I did find that story intriguing as well and it definately was fun to beat but after I was done, i just have no urge to grind on the same monsters over and over just to get a few trophies or achievements depending on your system of choice. So in turn it depends on your style of gaming I am a console gamer who enjoys FPS for the online multiplayer deathmatches, and RPG's for the intriguing storylines and gameplay.

Such valid points that do have a sense of humor. Still it does not negate the point I was making. As it just enforces it, now if you want to debate my point feel free but if your just trying to enforce it then I agree.

OK you want to know an example, how bout the constant attacks on DOD and DOE systems from china, that are not publicly published all the time. The US infrastructure is a huge vulnerability and if the right person(s) were hired to do the job we could be seeing a sever outage of gas, power, and yes even the internet itself in the US. Lets think now, most companies are moving to web-based apps as a way of providing more for less. Records are mostly stored on servers anymore and not so much in hardcopy form. There are countless things we would need power for and if someone were to take out huge chunks of the power grid the results though may not cause extreme physical harm, unless followed up by another attack, could cause the loss of millions of dollars for companies. I'm not talking take out one source, I am saying multiple sources of power and energy all at the same time. Following that up with any type of physical attack would be even worse. So all they are doing is preparing for a worse case scenario and talking about how they can better harden their networks. Cyberwarfare is real and it is a threat, don't ever think it doesn't exist. Because though you may not recall it the Internet was down for a time in our history as was Google, and other services that society is coming to rely on. And though some of us could get a long without technology, others have it so intwined in their lives, that they just might lose their minds if they lost it.

Your right that the "chair" in question is necessarily the one that the user is sitting in, however you make it sound as if the OP by Agarax is is wrong when its not. For as much as you harden a network and lock it down and secure everything those issues where some user looks at an e-mail and says sure i'll visit your BOA page and input all my information again because well you apparently need it, come on. I have work on secure facilities where things were locked down tighter on the network than fort knox and yet still a user managed to get some form of malware on the network. It happens, unless you completely take away use of the internet from users which by the way I dont recommend as it makes for a very unhappy workplace. However, Antique Geekmeister you aren't wrong either as security through obscurity and just all around poor physical security and network security could also cause as much damage. So as we step back and look at this, we can't blame any single person because depending on what the vulnerability is that was exploited is truly what dictates where the problem started.