Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:3000BC called... (Score 4, Interesting) 195

by Cruise_WD (#32313034) Attached to: New iConji Language For the Symbol-Minded Texter

I've been saying for a while now that the last few decades have seen the devolution of language. I'm not a linguist, as I'm probably about to demonstrate, but the development of written language went (very) roughly like: pictograms -> consonants -> vowels -> punctuation

Each level adding a bit more subtlety and complexity while reducing ambiguity.

Computer based communication has followed this path backwards almost exactly. Punctuation was the first to suffer, followed by an increase in consonant only abbreviations, and smilies started the trend towards the final step. It looks like we've just hit rock-bottom.

The trouble is, all the previous developments in written communication happened for good reasons, which are generally not explained, taught or understood any more.

Comment: Re:What's so bad about swearing, anyway? (Score 1) 698

by Cruise_WD (#32240242) Attached to: ACLU Sues To Protect Your Right To Swear

What people don't want to hear, basically.

Medical journals on female anatomy a few centuries ago would happily use cunt as the official term, whereas, "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn" has almost none of the punch it originally had.

It's just one of those things that has to be learnt, unfortunately.

Comment: Re:What's so bad about swearing, anyway? (Score 1) 698

by Cruise_WD (#32240168) Attached to: ACLU Sues To Protect Your Right To Swear

The association of words with meanings is such a practiced process by most people's minds that it is automatic. Hearing or seeing a word will immediately conjure up the associated mental semantic object, without any choice for the beholder (behearer?).

Normally, that's fine. However, words designated as profanity by consensus tend to be
a) associated with substances or actions that are generally "personal" - masturbation, copulation et al are /generally/ not performed in public, and doing so often generates a similar reaction to the profanity,
b) carry connotations of the worst aspects of the aforementioned topics. Sam and Bob make love suggests an activity that is mutually enjoyed and respectful. Sam fucks Bob imagines a somewhat more one-sided arrangement, with possible violent overtones (depending on the reader).

In other words, profanity as a class will induce an automatic mental imagining of the more unpleasant aspects of activities not usually encountered in a social situation. The visual or aural equivalent of an unpleasant smell being shoved under your nose.

Admittedly, the degree of discomfort varies between individuals, much as it does with smells, but it's still impolite to be so inconsiderate of others' potential feelings.

Comment: Re:Social networks (Score 1) 295

by Cruise_WD (#32182072) Attached to: Creating a Better Facebook

[quote]Unfortunately Facebook's power is in that everyone uses it, and that is what they use to get new users too. Alternative projects are a humble goal, but especially with social networks you are quite much locked in to a single existing network just because everyone else you know uses it, and they in turn use it because you use it too.[/quote]

Doesn't Facebook have an API? I'm fairly sure you could get a massive head start by allowing you to import contacts from, and cross-communicate with, Facebook via their own API.

The only reason I use facebook is because my friends use facebook. If I could keep the access without ever actually having to use fb itself, I'd be there like a shot.

Comment: Re:Assign responsibility to those who can do.... (Score 2, Insightful) 389

by Cruise_WD (#32129638) Attached to: The Desktop Security Battle May Be Lost

It seems reasonable to assume that most if not all of those IP addresses represent infected machines. Were there some way to get them shut down, imagine how much cleaner the Internet would be. However, there IS no way to do so: the ISPs hosting those machines don't provide any meaningful or automated way to report them, there is no way to contact the owner of those machines, so they just keep on spewing and infecting the rest of the system.

Nor will ISPs ever provide an automated way of reporting such machines as things stand now: a reporting mechanism is an internalized cost, and there is no reason for an ISP to internalize that cost when they can externalize it to the rest of the Internet.

On the contrary. Claim to be a representative of the movie or recording industry, and claim list those addresses as infringing your copyright. Tada. Instant automated disconnect (well, after the third time at least..) :P

Comment: Re:Don't worry! (Score 1) 389

by Cruise_WD (#32129442) Attached to: The Desktop Security Battle May Be Lost

That's okay, in another decade "The Year of Linux on the Router" will be just around the corner :P

In all seriousness, however, while there's nothing that can be done about the user making bad decisions, the OS can do a fair bit to mitigate the effect of those decisions.

Not running as a privileged user, having space, cpu and network caps in place, etc. are a start.

There always will be a trade-off between letting the user do something easily and not letting a program do something too easily. With decent UI design, education and OS support, however, that ratio can be improved.

Comment: Re:News for nerds. (Score 1) 763

by Cruise_WD (#32124108) Attached to: How Do You Handle Your Keys?

I used the same system for several years after losing my keys at a cinema. I could drive, open doors, etc. without the keys ever being physically seperated from my person.

I'm still absent-minded enough to have locked myself out of home a few times (forgetting to move keys when switching trousers, not forgetting trousers), but that's a much easier problem than being seperated from keys in the big wide world.

Promising costs nothing, it's the delivering that kills you.