Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Nicely Written Brief (Score 1) 525

by Croakus (#31202552) Attached to: Tenenbaum's Final Brief — $675K Award Too High

They deserve to be recompensed for their work, the same way anyone else does for any more tangible work, and with similar amounts of money for similar amounts of effort,

Than we agree. Thanks, it's good to know I have a friend out there.

Everything else you said was assumption, but I'll let that slide.

Comment: Re:Nicely Written Brief (Score 1) 525

by Croakus (#31201268) Attached to: Tenenbaum's Final Brief — $675K Award Too High

By taking it are you intending to permanently deprive the owner?

You are in fact depriving them of just reward for the years of hard work it took to create that art, as well as re-reimbursement for the money they spent to create the recording.

Attempting to disguise your theft with semantics only makes you appear less intelligent.

Comment: How to determine if you're a thief ... (Score 0, Troll) 525

by Croakus (#31199092) Attached to: Tenenbaum's Final Brief — $675K Award Too High

Seems like this concept has gotten fuzzy. I hope this simple three step Q and A clears things up for everyone.

1) Do you now have something that you didn't have a minute ago?
Examples might include cars, sneakers, or perhaps an MP3 audio file of a song and the enjoyment that you experience when you listen to that song.

2) Is this thing the product of someone else's hard work and financial investment?
Examples might include the years of heart ache and hard work that a songwriter puts into his craft in order to create something that enriches other people's lives. It might also include the years of rejection sweat and tears that go into a performer's craft.

3) Does the creator make, or hope to make their living by selling this thing? If so, did you take it without paying?
Examples might include a farmer who expects to be paid for the corn he grows, but you went out in the field and cut some yourself. Or a songwriter who only makes 4 cents off each sale of his song, but you downloaded it from Limewire instead of paying 99 cents on iTunes before driving down to Starbucks where you paid $4 for a cup of coffee.

If you answered "yes" to all three questions then you have stolen something that you were not permitted to take.

Comment: Re:Nicely Written Brief (Score 1) 525

by Croakus (#31199048) Attached to: Tenenbaum's Final Brief — $675K Award Too High

I hope this clears things up for you:

How to determine if you have stolen something.

1) Do you now have something that you didn't have a minute ago?
Examples might include cars, sneakers, or perhaps an MP3 audio file of a song and the enjoyment that you experience when you listen to that song.

2) Is this thing the product of someone else's hard work and financial investment?
Examples might include the years of heart ache and hard work that a songwriter puts into his craft in order to create something that enriches other people's lives. It might also include the years of rejection sweat and tears that go into a performer's craft.

3) Does the creator make, or hope to make their living by selling this thing? If so, did you take it without paying?
Examples might include a farmer who expects to be paid for the corn he grows, but you went out in the field and cut some yourself. Or a songwriter who only makes 4 cents off each sale of his song, but you downloaded it from Limewire instead of paying 99 cents on iTunes before driving down to Starbucks where you paid $4 for a cup of coffee.

If you answered "yes" to all three questions then you have stolen something that you were not permitted to take.

Comment: So it's better to hold back the brightest? (Score 1) 425

by Croakus (#31190618) Attached to: New Plan Lets Top HS Students Graduate 2 Years Early

Anyone who thinks this is a bad idea and that everyone should be forced to stay until they turn 18 simply because of some imagined "emotional trauma" they might suffer has NO BUSINESS TEACHING CHILDREN! Some kids are simply smarter than others and some develop much faster. It would be a crime to hold them back and effectively punish them for being smarter and achieving more.

The only thing you get by holding back intelligent people is a bunch of extremely intelligent anti-social people who are frustrated and don't give a shit. I know first hand.

Google's Buzz 1 Day Old and Already in Trouble->

Submitted by Croakus
Croakus writes "Looks like the automatic follow feature of Google Buzz is creating some privacy problems for people. Can you imagine your wife asking, "why is your ex-girlfriend linked to your Buzz account?" Yea, that wouldn't go well ... FTA, "At issue is a feature that compiles a list of the Gmail contacts who users most frequently e-mail or chat with. Buzz automatically starts following these people and makes the list public, meaning strangers can see who Buzz users have been in contact with.""
Link to Original Source

Oh, I get it!! "The BEACH goes on", huh, SONNY??

Working...