Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Why would it need studies? (Score 5, Interesting) 286

by Copperhamster (#40141011) Attached to: TomTom Flames OpenStreetMap

On the way to my former residence, all the mapping services I have ever use direct me to a bit of a shortcut, taking a small bridge over a local river instead of the bridge associated with the state highway.

Said bridge has been closed (condemed) since 1967.

I have attempted to bring this to the attention of multiple major map direction sites and gps companies, but despite 'accepting' my correction, the latest Tom-Tom unit (just for example) still gives the route over the closed bridge

Comment: 12 volt bad. Also, I don't think it's broke... (Score 1) 237

by Copperhamster (#39879525) Attached to: Open Compute Developing Wider Rack Standard

12 volts is horrid. Really. I have a friend that works in the car audio 'boom boom' industry and he really laments 12 volts. He has to run 0 gauge wire for items that bolt onto a fold down back seat of an SUV... how big a bus bar will we need for a full rack of 12 volt junk?

The limiting safety factor on voltage is breakdown of insulation. The limiting safety factor on current is wire diameter (and to a lesser extent, length). We've converted a good deal of our AC to 240 just to increase wattage capacity. Don't go the wrong way guys.

Also, if you are redefining racks:
23" already exists.
If you must make a new size, make it metric. Also make the rack units metric. And saying 1RU = 2.54 cm is not making it metric.
If you are standardizing everything else, come up with one (not neccessarily new) standard for 'how things are connected to the rack' (one thread, one style hole, one style thing to adapt thread to hole) so I don't have a drawer full of 18 different types of hardware for the things. (ok is this rack 8-32 or 10-32 or 12-24 or M5 or M6. Oh wait the rack kit wants square holes so I need to put this server over in that rack instead... but the nas array wants round unthreaded holes so it has to go across the room)

Comment: Re:Why? (Score 1) 297

by Copperhamster (#39563051) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: How Do You Test Storage Media?

Even better: Raid 6, with hot spare, cold spare on the shelf, and a unit that supports regular self-consitancy checking and automatic failure notification. My primary nas even has a wireable relay trigger, which is hooked to turn on a $20 spinning red light (old cop car style) sitting on top of the cabinet when there's an alert.

It's also powered by two ups's (one for each power supply) and supports network controlled shutdown on both.

If you can, order the drive packs (we got 2 packs of 4) from different vendors to minimize the chance of getting the same 'lot' of drives. Look at the amount of storage you need and get the minimum size drives... because they rebuild faster you are at less risk of a multi failure. I'd much rather have 12x 1 TB drives than 4x 3TB drives.

(And if you scoff at Raid 6, I've had a second drive fail hard during the rebuild when the system detected a probable failure on a drive and started to rebuild with the hot spare at 3 am...)

Also, backup backup backup.

If you need speed of course, you want raid 1+0. That's fine, my rule of thumb is:
Start with one hot spare, one cold spare.
After each 3rd mirror pair, add another hot spare. (so 6 total in use drives needs 2 hot spares)
Add another cold spare after every other hot spare.

Cold spares should be testable and tested. I will swap them out with the hot spares once a month.
But I'm paranoid.
Also:
Backup Backup Backup. RINB.

Also: HARDWARE RAID CARDS.

I can't stress that enough. software and semi-software raid is a joke.

Comment: I firmly believe in the second amendment. (Score 1) 1127

by Copperhamster (#39109941) Attached to: Hunters Shoot Down Drone of Animal Rights Group

And I believe these hunters should be arrested and that their hunting licenses should be revoked. There's a line. You don't step over it. They did. I don't care if the vehicle was on private, public, federal, or international territory. The aircraft itself is private property. You only fire against items of private property of another person a) with permission of that person, or b) if you have a reasonable fear of your safety.

Comment: Don't do this. It's broken (Score 1) 244

by Copperhamster (#37967350) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Spoof an Email Bounce With Windows?

When you generate these faked bounces they are generated through your receiving mail server. Invariably, some of those bounces go back to spam trap email addresses that are used in forged headers, causing your ISP's mail server to be black listed.

I have plugged in a customer 'milter' in our mail server to block this 'feature' from working. (bounces that the server doesn't create get routed to /dev/null.)

Comment: No different from a locked box in the court's view (Score 1) 887

by Copperhamster (#36721982) Attached to: DOJ: We Can Force You To Decrypt That Laptop

I think this is along the lines of... if you have a safe, they can, with a warrent/court order, force the safe open. And find incriminating evidence inside. It's not the same thing as forcing you to incriminate yourself. They are just looking at this as a container that's locked. If you have a safe full of documents, they get a court order to access them, and before they get to them you 'accidentally' set fire to everything in the safe, that's obstruction of justice. Essentially they are trying to treat electronic evidence no different than physical records.

Comment: Re:I think most people missed the point (Score 3, Interesting) 429

by Copperhamster (#34683136) Attached to: <em>Tron: Legacy</em> &mdash; Too Much Imagination Required?

Interesting thing most of the people I have talked to have missed. They've commented that CLU looked a little off, especially in the eyes. So the conclusion of many is that the tech just ain't quite there, however something occurred when watching (I was looking specifically for this bit).

When Flynn is having his storytime with his son at the beginning of the movie, he's also digitally restored to a youthful appearance. And he looks fine to me. There's none of whatever it is, and I agree it was there, that made CLU slightly bothersome to look at, at least for me. Therefore I believe that CLU's slightly off appearance, trigger to the uncanny valley as it were, is intentional.

I will admit there is another possibility, which is that it was there, however the more real backdrop of a young kid's bedroom vs the high contrast shiny of the world of the ghosts inside of the machine muted the effect enough to not be bothersome. That the setting compensated for the flaws in the composition, as it were.

panic: kernel trap (ignored)

Working...