Do you work for Paizo or something? They took the 3.5 rules and reprinted and sold them with very minor adjustments. The rules have to be open as far as I am aware because WotC unusually made the Open Game Licence where they open sourced their base rules, and so derivative works need to follow suit, which is why PF books say OGL on them. That people even buy Pathfinder is amazing to me. I am in a Pathfinder game on Thursdays and the difference from 3.5 is barely noticeable. In another group I'm playing the d100 Space Marine game this afternoon for the first time, though this group switches between 4e, nWoD and stuff like Dark Heresy, but they don't see the point in Pathinder, as they have all the 3.5 books, so why rebuy them with another company?

Are WotC occasionally a nasty company? Yes, they need to please their Hasbro overlords or they will be cut in to oblivion. Paizo SHOULD put more work in to their adventures, as they already put minimal work in to the ruleset and made a bunch of cash from it.

But seriously, do you work for them, with a post like this?

The sheriff was the defendant. The plaintiffs intended to uses the likes as evidence that the defendant fired them for protected speech. The judge said that the likes were not protected speech, which infers that if he did fire them for that then it was legitimate, meaning the case did not need to continue.

I am not a lawyer, but that's what I took from TFA.

I'm betting he is doing what an informed consumer should and putting his money where his mouth is when making an informed purchasing choice, in chosing not to support and fund a business model he doesn't like.

Allow Mozilla.org with noscript and it should work, it did for me!

In the style of the worst newspapers, the Daily Mail start with the result they want and steer all discourse towards it, even if it means twisting and lying along the path. They will just make it up if they need to do so, and there have been a lot of cases where this has happened!

It's interesting you say this, the last two letters that I sent from the UK to my friend in the USA arrived opened. I do not know if it was the UK or US governments, but it is something I should really look at.

Other way round.

As someone said earlier elsewhere, this only applies to companies with 250+ employees, and there's no obvious restriction on oursourcing.