Comment: Re:Only If Properly Designed AND Managed (Score 1) 571
Yes, it's true that those have to be redundant and damage resistant but traditionally on warships those things are exactly that. Coming back to the USS Missouri (because it's the ship I know best) I can tell you that just about anything worth doing on our ship can be done from 3 different places (sometimes more). And pretty much all of the critical systems are located in well-protected areas of the ship.
The British have been designing, building and operating warships for centuries - they had one of the best Navies on the ocean when the United States was just a gleam in George Washington's eye. I'm pretty sure they know what they're doing and that they'll make the critical systems hardened and redundant.
I'm a little surprised that these ships are intended to be conventionally powered. I realize that nuclear power brings its own set of problems, but it also has a lot of advantages -- for example not having to worry about fuel consumption en route to the theater (or theatre in this case, I guess) of operations.
-Coach-
The British have been designing, building and operating warships for centuries - they had one of the best Navies on the ocean when the United States was just a gleam in George Washington's eye. I'm pretty sure they know what they're doing and that they'll make the critical systems hardened and redundant.
I'm a little surprised that these ships are intended to be conventionally powered. I realize that nuclear power brings its own set of problems, but it also has a lot of advantages -- for example not having to worry about fuel consumption en route to the theater (or theatre in this case, I guess) of operations.
-Coach-