Isn't 12.04 supposed to be the next LTS release? Seems like they've gone far wayward from their original goals if they're introducing such huge new projects into what's supposed to be a stable, reliable release that enterprises can trust. It would be a better idea to introduce it in 12.10, surely?

That doesn't make "Android" any less "ready for the Enterprise", though does it? The Enterprise in question could go out and buy up a hundred Galaxy Nexuses to give out to its staff, regardless of how many are currently floating around in the wild.

In the UK, we have the Privacy In Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 and the Data Protection Act 1998, which, between them, legally guarantee a certain expectation of privacy from nosy sysadmins or managers. There are some good laws here, thankfully; employees should always know their rights.

/initiates magic force field and bounces the bullet 360 degrees, right back at HairyFeet/

Why do they call it the Xbox 720? Because when you see it, you'll turn 720 degrees and walk away.

First Kernel.org and now this? Has someone got it in for FLOSS at the moment?

I had a feeling that was going to be the case, which is why I put the question mark in; I haven't been keeping up on the minor details for a long time.

Aren't the odd decimal places development branches? Hence 2.4 -> 2.6. Ergo 3.1 is the ongoing development branch that will one day be released as 3.2.

Exactly what I was going to say, practically word for word.

"While Google+ will soon do all the things Twitter does, Twitter can't support a long list of the things Google+ supports"

Since when has featureset been Twitter's strong point?! It's managed to own all other competition while staying remaining in and of itself a platform that you can post 140 characters of text on, nothing more.