Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Aftermarket (Score 1) 455

by CaptSlaq (#43643027) Attached to: Why Your New Car's Technology Is Four Years Old

People who really care about cockpit entertainment will go through the trouble to have aftermarket equipment installed. This was true 40 years ago and it's the same today.

There are damn few aftermarket in-dash head units I consider well designed enough to put in a vehicle. Wake me when the majority pull their heads out of their collective asses and recognize that tiny buttons suck, touchscreens suck MORE, and that occasionally I wear gloves when inside the car.

I have ONE job when I'm in the driver's seat: Driving. Anything that helps me focus on that more is a win. Having to look down at a stereo to figure out where the hell the function I want to use is does NOT do that. There have been a handful of double-din units that succeed at this. Despite the disparaging comment, most factory head units are designed with the idea that someone may want to use it without having to look at it.

Comment: Re:Jackpot? (Score 1) 243

by CaptSlaq (#43137895) Attached to: Tesla Motors To Pay Off Government Loan 5 Years Early

Everything I'd read previously claimed it was a true series hybrid, apparently I'm mistaken.

GM hasn't done much to counter this perception for sure. It's not in their interest to say "Well, yeah, it's our version of a Prius". Doesn't sound nearly as sexy then.

I assume some people much smarter than I have basically made the determination that a series hybrid is not the way to go, but I'm at a loss to explain why that is. If someone knows an answer to this, I'd love to hear it.

Moon

+ - 3D Printer Could Transform Moon Dirt Into Lunar Base->

Submitted by puddingebola
puddingebola writes "Researchers at Washington State University have found a new application of 3D printing. From the article, "With 10 pounds of simulated lunar dirt (or regolith) in hand, NASA officials approached researchers at Washington State University and challenged them to melt and resolidify the fake moon rock using 3D laser printing technology, which produces objects layer by layer based on a computer model." Using a simulant of the regolith, or powdery material found on the moon, the researchers "fed the raw simulant powder into a 3D printer, heating the material to high temperatures and printing it out in smooth half-millimeter (0.02 inches) layers to form small cylindrical shapes with no visible cracks. The structures that came out of the printer were about as hard as typical soda lime glass, the researchers explain in a study detailing the recent experiments in the Rapid Prototyping Journal. [10 Cool Moon Discoveries]""
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Linus Torvalds is his own worst enemy (Score 1) 786

by CaptSlaq (#43004129) Attached to: Linus Torvalds Explodes at Red Hat Developer

Show me an actual shipping storage array that is linux at it's core.

All of Synology's stuff uses Busybox, which is generally backed by a Linux kernel. Their wiki article seems to back this idea. Small player, I know, but great hardware for the SMB that needs an iSCSI NAS for their first few pieces of VM infrastructure.

Comment: Re:Yay, time for finger pointing (Score 1) 201

by CaptSlaq (#42968327) Attached to: Japanese Probe Finds Miswiring of Boeing 787 Battery

Yes, and it's extremely annoying if you want to do anything to your own car. It's bad on the same level as proprietary connectors for phones and all that, but unfortunately the amount of people improving their own cars is too low to cause any consumer feedback to manufacturers. And I don't mean adding stupid spoilers and boost chips and sillyness, I mean stuff like adding an extra pair of high beams that can be operated with the same button as the regular high beams. That will take some serious hacking on a modern car. If car manufacturers were good at making things, this wouldn't be a huge problem, but modern cars do so many things wrong that it's infuriating. Like putting lambertian leds in places where they should have put batwing ones, forcing me to put a diffuser in front of it so that my daughter is able to sleep in her car seat. Or making it a fifteen-minute job to remove the battery for charging it during the winter, when it should take two minutes. Or putting the light that activates when you open the trunk in the far left corner of the trunk, so that it doesn't light up anything if you actually have something in the trunk. I could go on about this for a while...

An extra pair of high beams/driving lights can usually be done by just wiring a relay up to one of the lights that come on when you trigger the event you want to do; they still have to get a boatload of power to those lights somehow. It's not as elegant as pulling it from somewhere closer to the control itself, but it's very doable without too much work. The only exception I can think of for this is the HID systems that use servos to reposition the lens for high beams. Those are still fairly rare in my experience, and usually on offered on higher end vehicles that will seldom see a knife anyway. That said, I have a passion for cars and think about this kind of stuff quite a bit, so I may not be the audience you're speaking to about your complaint.

CAN has the potential to help modders actually: More and more is getting monitored by the system. If the system can be accessed by a third party device (like say via a standardized port) and the communication spec is public, the ability to do stuff with your car could be really neat. Your extra driving lights could be done elegantly, after you worked out how to get the raspberry PI to interface with the system.

Bad design lurks everywhere, it's not strictly the bailiwick of the automobile. It just happens to be one of the most common things that make it obvious.

That said, I completely agree: Some designers don't appear to actually have to use what they're designing.

Comment: Re:Not exactly news (Score 0) 251

by CaptSlaq (#42832445) Attached to: Email Trails Show Bankers Behaving Badly

"Ingenious"...You keep saying that. I think that word does not mean what you think it means.

Seriously, if anything that our banker overloards do is ever ingenious, the results will prove it, and the world will probably be a better place. However, sometimes my idea of genius is set to a longer time-line than what others would care to explore.

Any selfish act, no matter how well planned, cannot be called ingenious. Any act that promotes health throughout the world, no matter how simple, is always ingenious.

just my .02

Either you read Rand and didn't like it, or you REALLY need to read Rand and perhaps adjust the idea of what selfishness can accomplish. If the former, I respectfully disagree. If the latter, I would recommend reading and delving deep into some of the ideas that Rand presents.

Comment: Re:Its a trap! (Score 2) 104

by CaptSlaq (#42559241) Attached to: Mysterious Planet May Be Cruising For a Bruising

Thats no planet.

At least now we know around which star is Alderaan.

25 LY isn't far. We can send all the niggers, spics, baby boomers, political elite, lardasses, and other undesirables to this planet. Imagine how much better off the rest of us will be. Good riddance!

The hitchhikers guide has something to say about that very statement: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_minor_The_Hitchhiker's_Guide_to_the_Galaxy_characters#Telephone_Sanitizer

Certainly the game is rigged. Don't let that stop you; if you don't bet, you can't win. -- Robert Heinlein, "Time Enough For Love"

Working...