Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:We're a tech company... (Score 1) 242 242

A person with no GPS might get lost more often, but someone that has knowledge of the city and a GPS will be able to move around more efficiently and safely since he will not need to keep checking the map at every corner. And if want only to do one calculation right hiring a lot of extra high school dropouts will do no good.

Comment Re:We're a tech company... (Score 1) 242 242

You are still removing the freedom that someone has of not needing an insurance in their situation. A taxi driver needs insurance because the passenger can't depend on the driver for that, but a regular driver can decide if he thinks he can deal with the risk. Someone taking a ride with his friend should know his friend well enough to avail the risks himself.

I have been to places where driving blindly by GPS would lead to accidents or bad neighborhoods. Also, drivers that follow GPS blindly tend to be slower or to drive worse because their eyes are on the map most of the time instead of the road. I wouldn't discard city knowledge so quickly the same way I don't discard arithmetic. It's still good to know how calculations work because you might have mistyped that number and a basic knowledge would show that the result doesn't make sense.

Comment Re:We're a tech company... (Score 1) 242 242

This insurance system is broken if it needs the person at fault to have insurance. And what I meant as other requirement are things like knowledge tests which I have seen that are required in countries like England or Germany. I don't see why those countries should dump that requirement just because Uber has appeared, and I don't see why regular drivers should have to follow with them in other to be in the same category.

Comment Re:We're a tech company... (Score 1) 242 242

Why not put in the law that taxi drivers should have enough insurance to cover themselves and their passengers and let regular drivers choose whatever insurance level they want? Why should a regular driver face the same requirements as a taxi driver? Let's not forget that in some other places those requirements could involve more, and your solution would be to place the same requirements to regular drivers.

Comment Re:We're a tech company... (Score 1) 242 242

Now you are mandating compulsory insurance for all drivers, which I'm sure some people disagree with. And you are still treating uber and taxi drivers the same and distinct from regular driver, except that this time it would be the insurance company that makes the distinction, and not the law.

Comment Re:We're a tech company... (Score 1) 242 242

What I wanted to say is that I think the analogy was problematic. It's not like Uber wants to be treated like whites. Whites and blacks are functionally equal, in a way that taxi drivers and regular drivers aren't. So it would be more accurate to say that Uber wants to seat on the driver's seat, even though it isn't a trained bus driver. One might argue that it could do the job as well, but some might find it that unrealistic.

Comment Re:Yes & the sheer amount of existing code/fra (Score 1) 414 414

Once when I was teaching Python, it amused me to notice a beginner try to write a function in a way that would be valid Haskell, but wasn't valid in Python. Your own post also seems to find Haskell more natural. I wish I could spend more time with Haskell, it seems very interesting.

A programming language is low level when its programs require attention to the irrelevant.

Working...