Ironically, the guide itself is very irresponsible. Obviously written by a 50+ year old ex-hippie.
In their "Timeline," they advocate for those that campaigned for the release of "computer programmer Clark Squire." Clark Squire, aka Sundiata Acoli, was convicted of a 1973 murder of a state trooper. Incomprehensible that they draw out this example in their brief timeline.
They, of course, are anti-Military and anti-ICE, applauding those that deleted code they had written in protest. A responsible article would have couched the decision to support the Military or ICE as something to consider, not bad at the outset.
They come to the incorrect conclusion about bias in the Northpointe/COMPAS parole algorithm. It's not human biases that are programed into the software, it's statistics. Specifically, the study says "The authors found that the average risk score for black offenders was higher than for white offenders, but that concluded the differences were not attributable to bias."
Then, they offer advice - "nonprofit or government actors researching AI...are worth exploring" and small companies "are more likely to be in a financial crunch and possibly resistant to making decisions for ethical reasons."
Worth the read to see how old hippies think.