Comment: Re:Linux fanboys are funny (Score 1) 429
I'm sure it's the geek factor... not the fact that M$ has a gross portion of the market share and that's why malware writers focus on Windoze more than anything.
It's more likely both.
Comment: Re:Come on, folks, OPEN YOUR EYES! (Score 0) 191
Why BioWare's Star Wars MMO May Already Be Too Late 328
from the i-find-your-lack-of-faith-disturbing dept.
Comment: Re:If Linux wants to have broader adoption... (Score 1) 645
Comment: Re:Why not? (Score 1) 645
Because we are comparing Windows to Linux:
- Provision of real, available, phone-based technical support
And who is to do this? Can you call Microsoft to get help with your problems, without being IT head of a big company having big contracts? I have never heard of anyone being able to do so. Support always comes from the community: friends, family, and even the shop they bought the computer from. But not from the maker.
- Real, complete documentation
Admittedly I have never really dived into Windows documentation, but the "trouble shooting" wizards have never been helpful for me.
And if you're thinking of documentation of applications... I bet it's as bad for Windows as it is for Linux as it's the developer (person or company) that has to make it!
anybody can phone Microsoft for support, and have been able to for decades. You get 2 free support calls for Windows XP/Vista/Seven, after that, I think it's 49 bucks per incident. If you did not know that MS has vast technical support via phone, chat and email, you have no right to be even posting. That's one of the reasons businesses like MS, the support options. As far as documentation is concerned, MSDN and technet are massive, searchable and filled with with more documentation than anyone would ever need.